Today at 10:00 AM
You have this woman b 1583. Her son is given a birth date of 1648.
Does this not flag some kind of paradox alarm anywhere?
As far as I can see there are only three dates that have any bearing on this woman. Her marriage date 1645 - look it up on the IGI, that can't be too difficult. The birth date given in Fasti for her son George of 1676. And the statement that her husband had married before 1678 for the 2nd time.
So a bit of common sense would give an ESTIMATE only of 1628 - 1630. Sorry, common sense is a bit like Great Britain these days.
1583 - I'm amazed!