Terminology: "Border Ruffians" and "Pro-Slavery"

Начала Ashley Пятница, 18 Ноября 2011



Показаны все 3 сообщения
18/11/2011 в 4:09 после полудня

The terms that are usually used for the anti-abolition Missouri contingent are "Border Ruffians" and "pro-slavery." I realize there are both inherently charged terms, so I am wondering if anyone knows which terms descendants might prefer. The term "states' rights" doesn't really come around until the Civil War and probably doesn't accurately reflect the situation anyway, so I don't think that makes for a good replacement for "pro-slavery."

I don't think we can avoid "Border Ruffians" since that is /the/ term that's always used and it's what sources will use, including period sources, but if we could avoid "pro-slavery," that might be best. Any suggestions?

(And yes, I realize I am talking to myself at this point in the project. :))

18/11/2011 в 4:40 после полудня

Bushwhackers? Or maybe that's dated. That's what my grade school text book called them ;)

See also: http://www.laetusinpraesens.org/musings/bushwack.php

18/11/2011 в 5:38 после полудня

Hey! Someone else to talk to! :)

That page has me all confused. It's saying "Border Ruffians" are for belligerents on both sides. I thought that "Bushwhacker" referred more to the Civil War and to any Confederate guerrillas from the South, and that "Border Ruffian" was Bleeding Kansas-specific. So I guess I have more reading to do on this than I thought!

Показаны все 3 сообщения

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите в систему чтобы участвовать в этом обсуждении