Pieter du Plssis 1735

Started by Peter Dennis on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 11 posts
7/8/2012 at 1:28 PM

Help Please.
I made a mistake when veiwing peiter du plessis and moved him to where he should not or could not be!
I do not know how to undo it
regards
Peter

7/8/2012 at 3:13 PM

I think I have fixed thongs - not sure what you were wanting to do?

7/9/2012 at 7:33 AM

Nor am i really ,late at night
Thanks
Peter

7/9/2012 at 7:58 AM

Whiole we are in that vicinity please checck Anna Magdalena Louw
I think se should be b1 c11 and not where she is at b2.

Copy of correspondence to Robin in this regard attached
Dear Robin,
I am contacting you about this profile:
I Think you have added anna to the wrong daniel as sister there is a Daniel (1732)c9 married to Maria van Heerden who is decended from b2 Jean Louis
But there is also a Daniel (1732) C9 dececded from b1 Carel Prieur married to Helena Olivier
I think Anna Magdalena Louw fits into this line as C11
Anna also already exists on this line by someone else
Will contact them as well
regards
Peter

7/9/2012 at 9:41 AM

Peter - I haver moved her but I think there needs to be some work done on this tree -

http://www.ballfamilyrecords.co.uk/kfp/I114.html

and SAG have differing children - Richard has a second wife Elizabeth Vivier, and not as many children by the first wife. GISA do not have any errata listed that suggests this has been sorted.

I am going to see if there are any documents/inventories that might clarify.

Sharon Doubell any thoughts here?

7/9/2012 at 12:35 PM

June,
There is still another Anna Magdalena Louw b2c11 whom i think is the same as Anna Magdalena Louw b1c12.

7/9/2012 at 1:53 PM

June - you know I'm not sure that I know much about this profile at all :-(

Peter - cut and paste the url for the other Magdelena here - then it is easier to compare.

Alexander Armenis; Private User & http://www.geni.com/family-tree/index/6000000017137046442#600000000... have been doing work in the Jean Prieur line - so I'm going to ask them to keep an eye on what's happening here - as she's in his line it looks to me.

7/9/2012 at 1:54 PM
7/9/2012 at 2:07 PM
7/9/2012 at 2:12 PM

and

7/9/2012 at 2:21 PM

You are right Peter - I have moved the one to where she should be and merged the duplicates. SAG have her as b1c12 - but see my query above.

Showing all 11 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion