|
9/29/2010 at 12:24 PM
|
||
|
|
Private User
9/29/2010 at 2:12 PM
|
@Joshua. Absolutely. This region, even during the time of Tomas Francesco di Savoia was in flux. Francois alleged father fought at various times in what one could call a "warlord" or mercenary capacity for the Spanish as well as Bourbon French interests alternately for a nationalistic Piedmont area which varied allegiances between the 3 major power influences in the area, France/Italy/and Spanish royal interests. Italy was not yet a kingdom until 1860 nor united so various city-state/regional powers existed. This of course all played into who supported the Papal states or the Lombardy states or even the area south of Naples which part of the Sicily kingdom, not just the island of Sicily (The Savoys figured big in South Italy too) However, Turin (Turino) Italy was traditionally the family home of the Savoys (Savoia/Savoie/Savoye) in various spelling/pronunciations depending on national perspective. The family as far as I can trace actually has Swiss origin (original home of the Burgundian peoples of which the area of Burgundy, France is names)
Even if I am shown not to be related past Francois, studying this family is indeed a pleasure and much fun. I really find it wild that the relationship possibility of Francois and the alleged father Tomas Francesco opens up the keys to what may be the most storied bloodline in history from every angle. That is no small boast. The bigger story is if Marie Bourbon is the mother and that relationship were proven. Then you and I and several others can legitimately claim some very serious pedigree, direct and through 11 cousins over like every single sitting monarch and monarch to be in Europe.
|
|
9/29/2010 at 4:59 PM
|
Post deleted by joshua rediker on Sep 30, 2010 at 7:08 AM |
|
|
9/30/2010 at 7:08 AM
|
||
|
|
Private User
9/30/2010 at 8:03 AM
|
@Joshua. I doubt it in terms of "birth certificate" in the modern sense. The closest thing would be Church Parish records if any or Baptismal certificate. At issue is specifically which Parish or Diocese. The records I have seen show FRANCE not Italy as his place of birth. "Francois Savoie was born Abt. 1621 at Martaize, Loudun, Vienne, France, and died Bef. 1686." It is accepted that he was born in 1621 but the illegitimate status might have unfortunately made him "outside" of the official Church recordkeeping by the rules of the Church. If anyone has any insight into this issue for ANY ancestor on GENI, not just Francois, that would be great. The way the Roman Catholic church addresses these issues today may not be the same as in 17th century. I don't know honestly because I am not Catholic. The records USUALLY would show parentage but many people obviously were "off the grid" then as now (some by choice but that is another matter) |
|
|
Private User
9/30/2010 at 8:13 AM
|
@Douglas.
http://savoiegenealogy.blogspot.com/ i really enjoyed this post and the link. Thank you. It is an amalgamation of many of the similar musings I had through different sources that I pieced together on my own and this post seems to sum it up. He definitely would have been eldest and next in line for accession to any claim to head of household. The idea of banishment and/or exile due to political fallout in France makes a lot of sense. It is too bad that much of this historical interpretation, if true seems to have been whitewashed. "conspiracy theory-LOL" The current House of Savoy sure isn't interested in finding out or verifying the assertions of Francois' noble lineage possibilities. I wonder why? |
|
9/30/2010 at 12:24 PM
|
Post deleted by joshua rediker on Oct 1, 2010 at 5:54 AM |
|
|
10/1/2010 at 3:42 AM
|
Post deleted by joshua rediker on Oct 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM |
|
|
10/1/2010 at 6:05 AM
|
Post deleted by joshua rediker on Oct 2, 2010 at 3:33 PM |
|
|
10/2/2010 at 8:10 PM
|
||
|
10/2/2010 at 8:21 PM
|
Post deleted by joshua rediker on Oct 2, 2010 at 8:40 PM |
|
|
10/2/2010 at 8:41 PM
|
Post deleted by joshua rediker on Oct 9, 2010 at 11:32 AM |
|
|
10/4/2010 at 5:13 PM
|
||
|
10/9/2010 at 9:13 AM
|
it is notable that settipani in his book on the bourbons gives no other
but as extensive records were kept by royal/noble families of this ilk of such matters francois is not listed as a child of this marriage by any official records
a germain savoie asserted this a book written about 20 years ago
thomas and marie had 5 or 6 kids, including 3 sons, none of whom were
it seems that some of the soldiers used to supress the iroquois and later sent
marie soissons de bourbon could not be the mother of francois savoie thomas illegitmite it is more likely we would know the mother and not the father. the author in his book records as his father told him. francois came over on the ship st clement from the port of st marlo
|
|
|
10/9/2010 at 9:20 AM
|
||
|
10/9/2010 at 11:32 AM
|
||
|
10/26/2010 at 3:48 PM
|
||
|
11/12/2010 at 5:43 PM
|
||
|
11/16/2010 at 4:40 AM
|
||
|
|
Private User
11/16/2010 at 7:21 AM
|
It baffles me to believe that my 9th ggf would NOT at any other time other than his deathbed assert that he was the son of Tomas Francesco. The whole issue unfortunately is a sad story for many generations who held on to or hold on to the hope of such a tie, myself included. I wish there were contemporary accounts of any claims of such while preparing to leave France and establishing a life in Canada, that others had recorded. He seemed to be a humble man who did not go around boasting of any such relationship. If he had, we definitely would have heard about it in the history books. The other real fun is Francois wife...Catherine LeJeune and her supposed relationship to Chief Henri Membertou, another complete fabrication according to some bloodtype analysis of ancestors. There is Indian blood in their children's children but sometimes a tall tale goes a long way on the frontier. |
|
11/20/2010 at 3:11 PM
|
does that mean that he never was tomaso francesco's son, and that he lied about it on his deathbed, then why would he say on his deathbed that he was
in turin there is the savoy house there's a photo of a woman three kids and tomaso and young francois that could be our francois. see because he left 1642 - 1643 from st malo, france to go to port royal,
on one site they said he left 1648. they said that they found no records of any savoies leaving martaize, vienne, londun, france. |
|
|
11/21/2010 at 4:26 AM
|
||
|
|
Private User
12/28/2010 at 8:59 AM
|
Joshua. Your 11/20th post has great info. I still have never seen a picture of that painting with the 3 kids. Did it have a label saying Francois? People keep talking about it but a scan of a photo of that pic uploaded would be great for all to investigate. Thanks! Interesting Castillian info. THat might be why one person put some profile on here about a Catherine as a potential mother, maybe from Tomas Francesco's Spanish ties when he fought as mercenary for Spain at one time. Keep the ideas coming. I was totally against the concept of a Catherine as opposed to Marie Bourbon because the info in the profile was bogus in terms of parentage of that person. That doesn't mean another "mother" candidate does not exist, just not documented yet well enough. G |
|
12/29/2010 at 11:28 AM
|
I really appreciate these posts on this site. The Tid-Bits are fascinating & I hope eventually there will be more definitive documentation. I have to think that on all "royal" lineages there will be a motive at times for a woman to make a claim where the royal "father" may not agree. These "royal" dads clearly had mistresses for at least a couple of generations--were these relationships well-known and undisputed, I wonder? Because of the "deathbed" nature of Francois Savoy's
|
|
|
12/30/2010 at 10:35 AM
|
francois savoie in the back of his mind maybe wanted a new life,
was it tomasso or someone else and did carlo emanuele di savoia i tomasso's dad know about his illegitmite grandchild. i think that are answers lie in italy it may sound funny, but say
emanuele filiberto was 2nd prince of carignan and that's the way marie and tomasso wanted it or just marie. the question is was catherine philip iii habsburg and margaret of austria's daughter or was she catherine d' este. see philip iii habsburg and margaret had 8 kids 5 survived into adulthood. i think maybe philip iii habsburg had a mistress and she bore catherine. catherine habsburg was born in 1600 at madrid spain and she died 1627. |
|
|
|
Private User
12/30/2010 at 1:20 PM
|
Thanks for your last input especially of the succession power play theory. Putting an illegitimate Francois out of sight, out of mind and removing his potential to inherit any title would have been a motivation for scrubbing the family history. At current, noone in the Italian Savoia family wants to touch the subject, keeping their own ties to Tomas Francesco locked down with no questionable "new world" relatives, as many of us are if this is true. Whoever raised the young Francois, if his mother died (presumably Catherine as a candidate) may have been like a noble family nursemaid. It is not like it hasn't happened before in history. Catherine dies around his 6th year. Tomas is frolicking with Marie de Bourbon, getting married in 1625 I believe. She wants no interference with her own children, the current Savoia descendants. Francois raised as a semi-privileged landed Martaize farmer (this was in the area that the Bourbons held land). Knowing he won't get title rights in either Piedmont/Turin Savoie area in either Italy or France, he bolts with a colonization expedition to Acadie. Free to make his own way, sink or swim, he starts his own life in Canada. Voila...many of us have him as 8th, 9th or 10th great grandfather. (Much of above is not history-just conjecture FYI) I am very interested now in the Catherine story as I had been dead set against any such relationship before. |
|
12/31/2010 at 4:06 AM
|
it said that catherine was philip iii habsburg's daughter with a woman named catherine she might have been born in the el escorial palace in madrid built by philip iii habsburg's father, philip ii habsburg. philip iii habsburg was the product of an uncle marring his niece anna habsburg of austria . so that means tomasso and catherine would have cousins. |
|
|
12/31/2010 at 7:56 AM
|
||
|
|
Private User
12/31/2010 at 1:07 PM
|
kissing cousins in Euro royal families? Nah. Never. LOL. Wouldn't be the first time. That was one of the reasons people went before the church for divorce sometimes, for what they called "co-sanguinity" or sharing the same blood. Might explain the shunning of a product of such a union.
|
|
12/31/2010 at 7:30 PM
|
catherine probably met him and then started to court each other
|