I am having a bit of difficulty in understanding the father-daughter connection of a man (John Mohr) born circa 1347 -1407 and a daughter (Martha Pettigrew) born in circa 1660. This would make the father between 243 and 313 years older than the daughter.
Given the life spans and other historical data, it just seems rather far-fetched to associate these two as farther and daughter or to truly tie a blood line from Martha Pettigrew to John Mohr. I would love to think that I, as a possible descendant of Martha Pettigrew, am a relative of a Scotish Lord. Is there something I am missing here?