Cripplegate transcription error?

Find My Past has the same record, although it doesn't assign gender to them (and gives "Edw." as "Edward"). It is always possible a father named his daughter after himself.... Without the image of the original record it is difficult to say.
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/record?id=r_853046867%2f2

FMP also has a 7th August 1608 baptism in Stepney of a Matthew Staneley, son of a John Staneley which it would be safe to assume if the above individual:
http://search.findmypast.co.uk/record?id=r_949683101

Unless someone comes up with something definitive, I'd recommend posting about this here as they've been very helpful sorting out my issues:
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/london-middlesex-lookup-requests/

Edw could be Edwina, Edwardine, Edwarda, Edwardeen, Edwardene, Edwardina, Edwine

Indeed, that was what I was wondering - FMP does have it as Edward, but we'd really need to see the actual page to figure out if they just interpreted it as Edward. You never know, I've seen some handwriting (especially in Irish records) where Edw could easily be Ellen or Ellie.

--
A quick dig shows FamilySearch have:

The baptism in Stepney:
https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:J3CP-827

The wedding with an Edward Rich at St Gile's Cripplegate - Matthew is definitely in the second position as spouse, which usually means they are female:
https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NJ57-C4Y

Another wedding for Matthew Staneley the following year in Stepney (which is is easy enough to assume this is the person recorded in the baptism):
https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NJ88-P9H

No images available for any of them.

Could the St Gile's record be something like banns being read?