William Glover Cranfield, Sr. - Connections Need Corrections

Started by Debbie Gambrell on Thursday, January 14, 2021
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 8 posts

According to Wiki, this William Glover who changed his surname to Cranfield upon marriage to Joan Cranfield, heiress, was the son of William Glover and wife Joan (mnu) and a brother to James Glover. Wiki also shows this William's wife's maiden name as Cranfield, which he changed his surname to, not Glover.

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glover-3526

Sources are provided on the page.

The info on Katherine Cranfield on Wiki

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Cranfield-79

Katharine was born c. 1502 at Barford Parish, Bedfordshire, England.[1] She was the heiress of the Cranfields of Great Barford Parish, Bedfordshire, England.[2]

Her birth date, 1502, is a guess, based on her marriage in 1522.

Marriage
Katharine married in "Ao 13 Hen. 8" (1522) to William Glover (later Cranfield).[1] Apparently, "William Glover of Kempston Parish, Bedfordshire" was originally named Glover, and he "adopted" the surname of his wife, Katherine Cranfield, who was a rich heiress.[3] Their children all had the name Cranfield.[3]

All that said, THIS William Cranfield who married Katherine wasn't named WIlilam Glover Cranfield nor was his father. He was born William Glover and changed his surname after marrying heiress Katherine Cranfield who was not born a Glover but clearly born a Cranfield.

Also, according to Wiki, this William's mother Joan's maiden name is unknown and his father was William Glover, not William Glover Cranfield. That is confusing the father with the son since only one of them was born a Glover and changed his surname to Cranfield. That's why this William is William Cranfield Sr., not a Jr.

I too have major issues with this MP. This family group is comprised of two brother/sister couples, of succeeding generations. And none of it coincides with the pedigree chart given in the profile sources, which unequivocally states that the younger William (son of this one) William Cranfield of Watton-at-Stone "DIED WITHOUT ISSUE"

Yet he is married here without sources to a lady who died in Germany, with a bunch of English kids who are also without proof that they really existed. And it all seems to be associated with some sort of GEDCOM phenomenon.

According to the Visitations report, this profile in discussion made his will in 1535. And strangely, he and his wife are Geni siblings (not true):

Katharine Cranfield

She should be a Cranfield, if indeed he took her surname as she was a wealthy heiress. And his unproven parents are also Geni siblings:

William Glover

Joan Glover

His father was likely a Glover, but neither of his parents have been proven. And I seriously doubt they were siblings.

Here's his duplicate. There is confusion due to the various surnames associated with this profile (Carter, Glover, Cranfield). But I believe the pedigree chart is listed among the sources (if not, here it is again).

William Carter, Gent., of Kempston

Carter of Kempston (page 90 of the text):

https://archive.org/details/visitationsofbed1921harv/page/n110/mode...

Allow me to reiterate: The last profile I linked (the one I called "his duplicate") -- is the correct match for the person located at the very top of the Carter pedigree that I also linked (and which is attached to the profile under discussion here). If the chart got misassigned to the wrong profile, that might explain part of the problems.

It was a bad machine automated merge in 2010.

William Glover Cranfield, Sr. was connected to Katherine Cranfield as her husband with children Elizabeth Carter (Cranfield) and William Cranfield.
Dec 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM

Locations are different!

Because this profile has descent

William Cranfield of Watton-at-Stone

I created a new profile for William Cranfield, Jr. as a record.

Thank you for calling attention.

Thanks, everyone!

Showing all 8 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion