
This one's tough. The lack of any primary sources in GENI or other platforms, beyond the ones attributed below in the Ancestry inclusions is a real frustration.
https://www.ancestry.com/mediaui-viewer/tree/28080315/person/512897...
https://www.ancestry.com/mediaui-viewer/tree/193567/person/15024929...
https://www.ancestry.com/mediaui-viewer/tree/22338996/person/132620...
TREE WITH DIFFERENT PARENTS BUT FROM PERTHFORDSHIRE, SCOTLAND.
https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/person/tree/112424610/person/1...
If this tree is correct Catherine's parents marriage and her birth dates make better sense.
OTHER MENTIONS
https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/10570/images/dvm_L...
https://www.ancestry.com/mediaui-viewer/tree/112424610/person/16233...
Perhaps these will help!
Also, I don't see where the Bowen reference could have come from. There are no Bowens listed in https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2250413/memorial-search?firstna...=
either for her specifically or in the whole cemetery.
It seems that connection has conflated two people.
It seems there is no agreement on who her parents were. Her About section states:
Daughter of David Gilkey, Sr (1659-1756) and Barbara Crossley (1660-1727)
I don't know if the gedcom uploads threw in the extra parents, but I'm tracing a DNA cousin line that runs to these folks and I can't tell which pathway to continue on, given the conflicting parents.
Wouldn't it be better to disconnect any / all unproven parents rather than have potentially misleading pathways?
Thanks.
I think some prior questionable merges complicated the branch and began a snowball effect continuing along the wrong path. Evidently there is a lot of speculation surrounding it. Hopefully the more knowledgable managers of this profile will have time to check and correct it, but in the meantime I eliminated the least logical (also most recently introduced) set of parents; and adjusted her birthdate.
I somehow got caught up in the chaos, and quickly found myself in a hotspot that I should have been more careful to avoid. I have to take my own advice when it comes to merging profiles in families about which I know very little, and of which I haven't done enough investigation. Looking at past merges is part of it, something I didn't do that time. On the other hand, it may have been inevitable anyway, sooner or later. If not me, then someone else could have been drawn into the quicksand.
I rarely feel the need to completely undo work done by others long ago (some of it MP'd); so I'd rather compromise sometimes, by looking more closely at the established facts on the existing profiles. That's how I made a reasoned decision, this time. I feel it is better than leaving her with two entirely mismatched sets of parents.