As I see it, the Geni ruling which empowers Customer Services to delete is as follows.
"Geni may delete any Content that in the sole judgment of Geni.com violates the Agreement or which may be offensive, illegal or violate the rights, harm, or threaten the safety of any person or for any other reason.
My submission in question has been publicly available since 2016 and I do not find it "offensive, illegal or violate the rights, harm, or threaten the safety of any person." Deletiont can only be for SOME OTHER REASON, the most likely being that they have become duplicates of someone else's later research. .If they are duplicates, the correct procedure should be to merge the two and not for Customer Services to delete the earlier entry without notifying the profile manager that they have done so.
Now I have every respect for the difficult job that customer services have to do, but it does seem rather odd that when a profile a manager owns gets deleted by another subscriber, the manager receives notification, but when done by CS, the managers are not informed of the deletion, nor are they given an explanation for that action