
So, it turns out we're both wrong. :)
I had been updating the display names according to a list in a book, but apparently the official source is the White House Historical Association, and their numbering is as follows:
So if there's no objection, I'll re-do the display names for all of these women and get the numbering correct.
(Tagging Tamás Flinn Caldwell-Gilbert since he works on political profiles, and Erica Howton since she works on historical women. They could both have good input to guide us.)
And yes, to the "single guys" point -- there have been daughters and nieces who've served as First Lady, which is why the WHHA has a greater number of women than other lists. I think that actually makes a lot of sense, and certainly helps to avoid accidentally erasing women who held the position but weren't married to the president.
A doctorate's a doctorate -- "Dr." doesn't imply a medical degree -- so since that's how her name is always styled, and since that's how the WHHA recognizes her, we should stick with it. None of the previous First Ladies had a doctorate, which is why they don't have it.
Nothing from that particular website is usable -- it's a non-profit organization, not an official government office -- but I believe most of our profiles have these portraits through other means.
I think the reason we use the numbers is because we use them for presidents and other dignitaries, and also just saying "First Lady of the United States" can sound like present-tense. But I'm open to whatever we all agree on. I kinda like using the numbers because they help mentally "place" these women in the historical timeline, but again, I'm open to whatever.
Naming could be 1st lady, Michelle Robinson Obama, wife of 41st President....
List shows her as number 51
Always interesting! I keep ending back here. Please see my Discussion about SHIELDS per the Finding Your Roots episode with Roseann Cash Rosanne Cash
Thank you
Before I go too far, does this format work for everyone:
Martha (Dandridge) Washington, 1st First Lady of the United States
I'd especially appreciate input from Erica Howton since she always has a good handle on these things!
I believe our preference has been to use "United States" instead of "USA" for government types (and adjacent ladies :)) since "USA" wasn't in use until later on, while "United States" always has been. I'm seeming to remember a conversation about that but the memory is hazy.
I think they’re the same (U.S. and U.S.A.).
Both of these abbreviations can be correct. The difference between them (whether to use periods or not) is just a matter of style. The Associated Press Stylebook prefers the abbreviation U.S. with periods.
Is it correct to say US or USA? However, there is a growing trend to drop the periods in such abbreviations. Thus, the abbreviations U.S. and US are both in common use as nouns or adjectives, while U.S.A. and USA are both used as nouns. The newspaper USA Today is popular outside U.S. borders.
Wikipedia writes it out as United States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Obama
I like Martha Washington’s styling as you did it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Washington
Obviously not using the numbering yet.
...and we only have to get to the third president before realizing that our "First Spouses" project doesn't actually work for this purpose, because Martha (Jefferson) Randolph, 3rd First Lady of the United States was Jefferson's daughter, not wife. There are going to be several nieces coming up, too.
We need a new "First Ladies and Gentlemen of the United States" project for those to actually serve in the role.