When I came across this line it was even more of a mess.
Given my knowledge Ive done the best I could to clear it up.
As a curator I know you can see who made what changes and when.
I dont have the extensive knowledge of Dutch that you do now that I do. I will definitely consult you in the future. Although I record a lot of names and dates I dont feel that's all this is about.
Although I do have a Dutch line in early New Amsterdam and I and a curator whom I
work with closely were both curious as to names. I would like if you dont mind looking
at that for me at a later date. I have a feeling you could find info on them from across the pond.
Everything ive done on this line is information I found in the Sources then relayed it as such. Have you looked at all of the sources? It explained how and why all of the Dutch settlers had multiple names. I got that information from sources. I did not make them up.
I put all of the 10 sources on Sweer's profile. His profile was pretty incomplete. I had a hunch there was more to be found. I dont know how many empty profiles I built into something significant. If i hadn't sourced further you wouldn't be his second wives curator. Did you read them?
One or more of these sources explained how and why those Dutch settlers were referred to by multiple last names. I think an expert such as yourself would find it enlightening and better explained than by me.
Im not a genealogist but have learned a lot over the last for years I go back and forth trying to prevent mistakes but I make them. Im thorough, I read and research. Im sure you know there are many on Geni who do not. Even worse they dont communicate
If I'm wrong Im wrong I want Geni to work correctly.
--------------------
That being said will you look into this discussion? The managers aren't communicators.
https://www.geni.com/discussions/267831
I would appreciate it.