Jane HILLS - BUSHNELL - Jane's birth place, parentage and offspring all look dubious

Started by Craig Andrew Miles on today
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 2 posts
Today at 6:37 AM

Having read the description in the About section, I have to say that it is very unlikely, that unless the parentage of Jane is incorrect, it is highly unlikely that she was born in England as both parents John Bushnell and Sarah Bushnell are listed as having been born in Connecticut.

Having said that, with Jane's DOB given as 1648, and her parents John and Sarah listed as DOB 1636 and 1645 something looks wrong with this parentage anyway. There is little scope to make Jane's DOB later with her having had her first child Dorothy Bushnell (died young) in 1651 at the age of 3!

All in all, this profile looks very mixed up and a number of fixes look necessary to make everything look consistent

Today at 12:17 PM

Hi Craig Andrew Miles

Thank you for calling attention. I’ve detached Jane from mistake - parents, locked relationships, cleaned up the “about.” Now I’ll check on children & husbands 1) John Bushnell 2) John Hills

Showing all 2 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion