I have found out that many of the merges been requested, actually is outside "the big tree"
I think we as Susanna also have said should undo all these merges and make no more.
We already have enough merges that needs to be done we don't need looking for more!!
And if Samuel is right we’ll get even more when the collaboration will be set free
This is an example of a manager whos profiles should not be merged.
A few days ago this profile was just one and not connected to our tree.
Today there are two Eva Bratvold and they look like this.
http://www.geni.com/people/Eva-Bratvold/6000000000726573150#/tab/ov...
Eva Fuhre Bratvold
As you can see it is not serious and it actually disturbes me quite a lot that someone keeps us busy for h o u r s disconnecting pending merges.
When I view them, the two Eva-Bratvold profiles show up as "public profiles". This means that the person who created these has their privacy/permission settings set too high to allow us to see any of the details. It does NOT necessarily mean that that the profile is not serious. For all we know, there might be all kinds of useful info hidden in there that we're just not being allowed to view.
I took Eva as an example of a manager whos profiles we shouldn't merge, but instead undo the pending merges.
(With not being serious I ment the managers being Sigurd Ring and others....
When I look at Eva's profiles one is public (not connected or settings very tight) and the other is connected to me. It is strange that David (further up in the thread) isn't connected as David is connected to me. Isn't it?)
@Eva Bratvold
please respond to our questions and messages as this will help both you and us to get a better viewable tree.