The first one (managers James Howard and Bryan Edwin Cox) shouldn't be any problem. Same birthyear, same wife but some of the children doesn't match with the cjhilrden in the main profile. (Though there are probably some duplicates among the children in the main profile too.)
The second one has a middle initial wrong, birthyear off by 23 years, same parents, same wife, and the same 29 children. I'm scepticle about this one. Looks to me that he is one generation wrong with wrong parents, wrong wife and wrong siblings. John B Wright is mentioned among the children in the main profile, maybe that is a better match in this case.
No, only duplicate children that haven't been merged together yet.
But I have among my Schjelderup-family in Norway one priest that had 23 children, 5 with his first wife and 18 with his second. The second wife was 16 years at marriage, of course got her first child about 9 months later, and had her last child at age 42. I do not envy her that job, and I'm a man.... :-)
I think you made the right choice, Noah.
I always try to get first hand/primary sources to my profiles. Ofcourse it's not always possible, but in this case with a person born i 1809 the possibilty is there.
It's usually a big job to get primary sources to our data, but that must always be our objective. Secondhand sources is never, ever as good as primary ones. Keep that in mind, genealogists on Geni, and never, ever copy information from a site on ther internet without checking if the information is right with primary sources, if there is a possibility to do so.
More than 50% of the homepages with genealogical information that is older than 1700 is wrong. The owner has most often copied bogus information from another homepage. Main rule, if there's no source-citation, DO NOT TRUST IT AND DO NOT COPY IT. iT'S MOST PROBABLY WRONG INFORMATION.
If there are no sources for the information, keep away from the site. That's is why I am so pushing on getting sources into Geni. As long as there's no sources in Geni, all the information is as unreliable as any other homepage with genealogy-information without sources on the internet.
And now you can flame me for my strict point of view. :-)
Semi-proffesional genealogist from Norway.
There is always the option of adding extra possible info in the "about me" section, also some sources are based on hand written documents, which could explain some differences in dates from other sources. that doesn't mean the data is wrong just misunderstood, in general if the information is close enough, there is nothing wrong of adding it.
@Marsha There is no possibility to have no info about a person. You must have gotten the name from someone/somewhere and that is your source for the information about the person even if you only have the name. I would also like that the sources for all information put in the About me section. It will help in merges when we no the source for the information, since we then can compare sources and find out which one we trust the most and use the information from that source.