Can anyone tell me why Sir John Goring (c1430-1495) is listed as John Goring I, when according to the tree his father grandfather and great-grandfather were also John? Is there a reason, should it be changed?
It was probably because one person's line only went as far as the one John so they had him as #1. Any way I changed the whole line. It's important to put these suffixes or other distinguishing marks in the display name so they don't get accidentally merged together.