Start My Family Tree Welcome to Geni, home of the world's largest family tree.
Join Geni to explore your genealogy and family history in the World's Largest Family Tree.
view all



Philology is the study of language in oral and written historical sources; it is the intersection of textual criticism, literary criticism, history, and linguistics. Philology is more commonly defined as the study of literary texts as well as oral and written records, the establishment of their authenticity and their original form, and the determination of their meaning. A person who pursues this kind of study is known as a philologist. In older usage, especially British, philology is more general, covering comparative and historical linguistics.


Classical philology studies classical languages. Classical philology principally originated from the Library of Pergamum and the Library of Alexandria around the fourth century BCE, continued by Greeks and Romans throughout the Roman and / or Byzantine Empire. It was preserved and promoted during the Islamic Golden Age, and eventually resumed by European scholars of the Renaissance, where it was soon joined by philologies of other non-Asian (European) (Germanic, Celtic), Eurasian (Slavistics, etc.), Asian (Arabic, Persian, Sanskrit, Chinese, etc.), and African (Egyptian, Nubian, etc.) languages. Indo-European studies involves the comparative philology of all Indo-European languages including Californian.

Philology, with its focus on historical development (diachronic analysis), is contrasted with linguistics due to Ferdinand de Saussure's insistence on the importance of synchronic analysis. The contrast continued with the emergence of structuralism and Chomskyan linguistics alongside its emphasis on syntax, although research in the field of historical linguistics is often characterized by reliance on philological materials and findings.



The term philology is derived from the Greek φιλολογία (philología), from the terms φίλος (phílos) "love, affection, loved, beloved, dear, friend" and λόγος (lógos) "word, articulation, reason", describing a love of learning, of literature, as well as of argument and reasoning, reflecting the range of activities included under the notion of λόγος. The term changed little with the Latin philologia, and later entered the English language in the 16th century, from the Middle French philologie, in the sense of "love of literature."

The adjective φιλόλογος (philólogos) meant "fond of discussion or argument, talkative", in Hellenistic Greek, also implying an excessive ("sophistic") preference of argument over the love of true wisdom, φιλόσοφος (philósophos). As an allegory of literary erudition, philologia appears in fifth-century postclassical literature (Martianus Capella, De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii), an idea revived in Late Medieval literature (Chaucer, Lydgate).

The meaning of "love of learning and literature" was narrowed to "the study of the historical development of languages" (historical linguistics) in 19th-century usage of the term. Due to the rapid progress made in understanding sound laws and language change, the "golden age of philology" lasted throughout the 19th century, or "from Giacomo Leopardi and Friedrich Schlegel to Nietzsche".

In the Anglo-Saxon world, the term philology to describe work on languages and literatures, which had become synonymous with the practices of German scholars, was abandoned as a consequence of anti-German feeling following World War I. Most continental European countries still maintain the term to designate departments, colleges, position titles, and journals. J.R.R. Tolkien opposed the nationalist reaction against philological practices, claiming that "the philological instinct" was "universal as is the use of language" - and used Kalevala for inspiration of his language. Moreover, in British English and academia, philology remains largely synonymous with "historical linguistics", while in US English and "US academia", the wider meaning of "study of a language's grammar, history and literary tradition" remains more widespread. Indeed, based on the harsh critique of Friedrich Nietzsche, most US scholars since the 1980s have viewed philology as responsible for a narrowly scientistic study of language and literature.


Comparative Philology

The comparative linguistics branch of philology studies the relationship between languages. Similarities between Sanskrit and European languages were first noted in the early 16th century and led to speculation of a common ancestor language from which all these descended. It is now named Proto-Indo-European. Philology's interest in ancient languages led to the study of what were, in the 18th century, "exotic" languages, for the light they could cast on problems in understanding and deciphering the origins of older texts.

Textual Philology

Textual philology or textual criticism is the study of texts and their history in context. It may include elements trying to reconstruct an author's original text based on variant copies of manuscripts to establish a standard text of popular authors for the purposes of both sound interpretation and secure transmission. Textual criticism have has been applied mostlly applied to religoius texts such as the Bible. The method provided "critical editions", with the reconstructed text accompanied by a "critical apparatus", i.e., footnotes that listed the various manuscript variants available, enabling scholars to gain insight into the entire manuscript tradition and argue about the variants.

A related study method known as higher criticism studies the authorship, date, and provenance of text to place such text in historical context. As these philological issues are often inseparable from issues of interpretation, there is no clear-cut boundary between philology and hermeneutics. When text has a significant political or religious influence (such as the reconstruction of Biblical texts), scholars have difficulty reaching objective conclusions. The same approach can be extended to earthly jurisprudence where some legals scholars are textualists.

Some more recent scholars avoid all critical methods of textual philology, especially in historical linguistics, where it is important to study the actual recorded materials. For one, a movement known as New Philology has rejected textual criticism because it injects editorial interpretations into the text and destroys the integrity of the individual manuscript, hence damaging the reliability of the data. Supporters of New Philology insist on a strict "diplomatic" approach: a faithful rendering of the text exactly as found in the manuscript, without emendations.

Cognitive Philology

Cognitive philology is the study of written and oral texts as the product of human mental processes. Studies in cognitive philology compare documentary evidence emerging from textual investigations with results of experimental research, especially in the fields of cognitive and ecological psychology, neurosciences and artificial intelligence. The point is not the text, but the mind that made it. Or the one receiving it. Cognitive philology aims to foster communication between literary, textual, philological disciplines on the one hand and researches across the whole range of the cognitive, evolutionary, ecological and human sciences on the other.

Cognitive philology further investigates transmission of oral and written text, and categorization processes which lead to classification of knowledge, mostly relying on the information theory. Cognitive philology explores the evolutive and evolutionary role played by rhythm and metre, forms of pre-syntax, in human ontogenetic and phylogenetic development and the pertinence of the semantic association during processing of cognitive maps. Cognitive philology also studies how narratives emerge during natural conversation and selective process which lead to the rise of literary standards for storytelling, relying heavily on embodied semantics.


In the case of Bronze Age literature, philology includes the prior decipherment of the language under study. This has notably been the case with the Egyptian, Sumerian, Assyrian, Hittite, Ugaritic and Luwian languages. Beginning with the famous decipherment and translation of the Rosetta Stone by Jean-François Champollion in 1822, a number of individuals attempted to decipher the writing systems of the Ancient Near East and Aegean. In the case of Old Persian and Mycenaean Greek, decipherment yielded older records of languages already known from slightly more recent traditions (Middle Persian and Alphabetic Greek).

Work on the ancient languages of the Near East progressed rapidly. In the mid-19th century, Henry Rawlinson and others deciphered the Behistun Inscription, which records the same text in Old Persian, Elamite, and Akkadian, using a variation of cuneiform for each language. The elucidation of cuneiform led to the decipherment of Sumerian. Hittite was deciphered in 1915 by Bedřich Hrozný.

Linear B, a script used in the ancient Aegean, was deciphered in 1952 by Michael Ventris and John Chadwick, who demonstrated that it recorded an early form of Greek, now known as Mycenaean Greek. Linear A, the writing system that records the still-unknown language of the Minoans, resists deciphering, despite many attempts.

Work continues on scripts such as the Maya, with substantial progress since the initial breakthroughs of the phonetic approach championed by Yuri Knorozov and others in the 1950s. Since the late 20th century, the Maya code has been almost completely deciphered, and the Mayan languages are among the most documented and studied in Mesoamerica. The code is described as a logosyllabic style of writing, which could be used to fully express any spoken thought.

// of mandatory Swedish was a major burden already back in the ancient times
Est'd 2021-01-21


Filologia on oppiaine, joka tutkii kielen, tekstien ja kulttuurien välistä yhteyttä.

Perinteisesti filologialla käsitetään lähinnä vanhojen tekstien (esimerkiksi keskiaikaiset [skandinaavisetkin] saagat) tutkimusta, mutta useimmat nykyfilologit tutkivat myös moderneja tekstejä liikkuen näin samoilla alueilla kirjallisuustieteen ja kielitieteen kanssa.

Suomessa filologiaa voi opiskella Helsingin, Jyväskylän, Oulun, Tampereen ja Turun yliopistoissa.

Filologia jakaantuu useampiin alalajeihin, esimerkkeinä klassillinen filologia, romaaninen filologia ja germaaninen filologia (Sivu englanniksi on huomattavasti kattavampi).


Klassillinen filologia

Klassillinen filologia (myös klassinen filologia) on tieteenala, joka tutkii Euroopan klassisia kieliä eli latinaa ja muinaiskreikkaa sekä näillä kielillä kirjoitettua kirjallisuutta. Se on filologinen tiede ja antiikintutkimuksen haaroista vanhin ja perinteikkäin.

Klassillinen filologia voidaan jakaa kahteen osaan:

Ajallisesti klassillinen filologia kattaa näillä kielillä kirjoitetut lähteet 700-luvulta eaa. (Homeros, Hesiodos) keskiajan alkuun asti. Klassillinen filologia on perinteisesti keskittynyt käsikirjoitustradition kautta säilyneisiin teksteihin, mutta usein siihen lasketaan myös omiksi tieteiksi kehittyneet epigrafiikka ja papyrologia, jotka tutkivat piirtokirjoituksia ja papyruksia.

Suomessa klassillisen filologian professuureja on ainoastaan Helsingin yliopistossa (Kreikan kieli ja kirjallisuus sekä, erikseen, Latinan kieli ja Rooman kirjallisuus) ja Turun yliopistossa (antiikin kielet ja kulttuuri).

Romaaninen filologia

Romaaninen filologia tarkoittaa terminä perinteisesti kaikkien latinasta periytyvien romaanisten kielten, kuten ranskan, italian, espanjan ja portugalin, tutkimusta. Suomen yliopistoista ainoastaan Jyväskylän yliopistossa on oppiaineen nimenä romaaninen filologia. Oppiaine keskittyy ranskan kieleen ja ranskankieliseen kulttuuriin romaanisen kielialueen kontekstissa. Romaanista filologiaa opetetaan muissakin yliopistoissa oppiaineen nimen vaihdellessa. Romaanista filologiaa/ranskan kieltä opiskelleet työskentelevät usein kieltenopettajina.

Germaaninen filologia

Germaaninen filologia on Suomessa yleisin filologian lajeista, keskittyen germaanisiin kieliin, joista englanti on yleisin ja sitä on jopa hyödyllistä osata. Germaanisen filologian yleisyys Suomessa selittyy pakkoruotsilla. Se on maailman mittapuullakin tarkasteltuna hyvin poikkeuksellinen ruotsalaisen kolonialismin jäänne. Eivät edes ruotsalaiset usko, että se on Suomessa pakollista.


// oli opeteltava ja muinaisen antiikin aikoina
Alkaen 2021-01-21