I think a few of these profiles were added just for DNA surfing? Very limited information on the profiles and absolutely no documentation for the first group. The second group are wrong DNA and completely wrong area.
It takes hours to untangle the mess- The rule should be, no merging without proof of lineage- period- probated wills, etc.
The mtDNA mtN* doesn't match a straight line
Can someone from FTDNA please upload a correct direct Walker yDNA
___DNA surfing I think for these extra Children ____ mtDNA doesn't match us!
I can say it's not mtN*
1. Henry Walker
Birth estimated between 1707 and 1763
2. Susanna Walker estimated between 1707 and 1763
3. William Walker estimated between 1707 and 1763 no death date ridiculous!
4. James Walker estimated between 1707 and 1763 No Death Date - ridiculous
5. Henry Walker estimated between 1707 and 1763
_________________________________________________
These DNA surfers don't match me- I'm a direct maternal Lancaster/ Walker Hudson/ though my grandmother Lancaster- I have a direct male Lancaster cousin who is linked as well.
DNA mt-N* wrong type ?
Bristol Parish Lost Children - they don't belong on this profile --- Just born in completely wrong area for all these children, people can't read.
1- Robert Walker, Sr He was updated and merged in on Jul 25 recently DNA Surfer __ t
"Prince George, "Prince George", "Virginia"
2. Freeman Walker ****
September 03, 1734
Brunswick, Virginia
3. Alexander Walker ****
October 03, 1727
"Bristol Parish,
4. Linder Walker
August 02, 1728
"Bristol Parish, "Prince George", "Virginia