George Alexander Way - evidence

Started by Private User on Friday, August 13, 2021
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 21 posts

what evidence is there for this person and his relations, and why is there a 'middle' name Alexander?

Adam, not sure what your question is... "why" is there a middle name? Why wouldn't there be one if it located? As to evidence...Just following the path of ancestors that are listed as being direct descendants.

I have no knowledge of the name Alexander for this man. Where is he documented, and the information about his relations?

Larry C. Goldsmith What was the source that you used when you added George Way to Geni?

Hello to all,
Larry C. Goldsmith is correct, just follow the direct descendants.
I am the direct descendant of George Alexander Way.
My Great Grandmother was Gertrude Amelia Way. His name is correct as George Alexander Way . Thank You

Private User I am confused by what you mean with "just follow the direct descendants." You say it's correct, so I presume that you must have some source which you base that on. What is the source you are using?

Alexander is a family name for the WAY family and is passed on ad infinitum. I found my first Alexander 60 years ago, when I was a novice and did not record sources. He lived in Tavistock, Devon.

there are people named Alexander in the Way family, this man is George and where is there any reference to him having a middle or alternative name Alexander?

Private User wikitree is only as good as it's sources, and that profile only links to a rabbit hole of online family trees. That's not a proper source. I will ask again, does anyone have primary source based evidence that this person existed and he had a middle name?

I adjusted the profile. Should be correct now. Have a good day!

he certainly existed, I was querying his middle name

Private User "I adjusted the profile. Should be correct now. Have a good day!"

This is absolutely unacceptable behavior. You cannot just try to delete all these profiles and vandalize the remainder that you cannot delete. This is a shared tree and this sort of petulant vandalism will not be tolerated.

Let us pool our sources and create a quality tree. I don't understand why this is so difficult to do. For example, Roz Lacey, since you claim to have been researching this family for the past 60 years, would you be able to contribute some of your knowledge and sources to improve this tree?

thank you for speaking up there Tamás, it was completely unacceptable behaviour. I repaired what I could, immediately on seeing the damage.

Caldwell - you say 'I CLAIM'? Very unpleasant. I am a WAY - direct descendant. Why don't you widen your reading matter and find the source yourself. I don't think I would like to share with you as you are so cavalier. Advise anyone interested to try BURKES PEERAGE as it has a wealth of information.

later on historical work covering 17th to early 19 centuries stateside. i don't know how much it has any reference to the earlier period back in England, looks interesting anyway.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/39519100-george-way-and-his-des...

i bought a copy which should arrive tomorrow, i will keep people informed of any relevant content.

?

there is just a brief note in the preface, with mention of William Way, yeoman of the guard for Henry VIII. also that this William was a Somerset man, grandson of an Alexander from Somerset.

George in the book title is supposed brother of Henry "the puritan", and together they were both early immigrants to the states, George as one of the Massachussets bay colony founders.

the author mentions he has traced the surname back to the 10th century but gives no details, only suggesting that the Devon, Somerset and Dorset families by the name of Way (more usually spelled Waye in those earlier days) are all branches of the same family,

the Devon branch, i can inform is "de la Waye" who became Davie.

George and Henry were more likely cousins than brothers, great grandsons of the George on this profile. George arrived in New England in the following year after Henry, so 1630 then 1631.

Showing all 21 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion