Erica Howton I saw where you had curated this profile and that's great. However, his descendants aren't lost. We have discussed this before, that 'back in the day' before the internet and DNA, obviously some researchers lost track of this Henry and his brother Charles and designated them as 'the lost Morgan tribes'. I had told you previously that I had 37 DNA matches shared on Ancestry with cousins all sharing this Henry and his wife as our ancestors. I just rechecked it and have gained a few new cousins on the lines: 39 DNA matches through Henry Morgan.
So I consider that with the advent of the internet and now with DNA matching, the Morgan lines that some considered lost have been 'found', although we never consider our family lost. So I think it's incorrect to state "...their descendants are hence 'lost.'
Maybe it could say, "...thanks to DNA evidence, their descendants have been identified".
Just a suggestion so those of us descended from Henry don't feel still dismissed as lost Morgan lines. We've been here all the time . Some people just didn't know where our branches went, but we have always known where we've been. My mother herself could recite up to this Henry's son Henry II who served as a judge to me years ago, without any internet or DNA.
Thanks in advance to any consideration given to the DNA evidence and my thoughts on being considered a lost descendant.
