If there was a groundswell of opinion that the projects you name above are too loose then I'd be happy to lose them - eventually the index will, I imagine, fill up with towns and cities and villages.
I'm understanding your point Erica and can see it's ambiguous and would therefore like to just see what others think. I included them because I thought if someone was researching their family and discovered they may have come from Berkshire or say the South of England then they might find a clue by looking at family heads and famous people in the counties of South of England including Berkshire. The Genealogical Resources is also specific to the county.
Sure, they are fabulous related projects, and could be indexed within the Berkshire county project, and will show as a related projects, and in tags, and in search.
I'm all ready to take them out Erica but don't want to take them out and then get others saying that they think they should have stayed.... I'll just bide my time. Doesn't mean I'm not listening and not going to do as you suggest, I just want some consensus first.
You can make projects for anything, but you really should work with a British curator on this. They haven’t set up geography in the same way as in the States.
Stepney is large and historic enough for its own project.
Follow Us
Like Us
Problem with this page?
