![](https://www.geni.com/images/external/twitter_bird_small.gif?1647378348)
![](https://www.geni.com/images/facebook_white_small_short.gif?1647378348)
I love that we always have the same interests with entertainment-related projects and profiles. :)
Are we saying talk show hosts who are American or hosts of talk shows produced in America?
I ask because you have cases like CraigyFergs (though he is proudly naturalized, so he's included either way) and Graham Norton (briefly hosted a show on Comedy Central but otherwise not "American").
I was thinking about radio, too, but a think a companion project might make sense. The lists for both could get lengthy.
So, I wouldn't consider someone like Daniel Tosh to be a talk show host because he doesn't have guests other than in taped, partially scripted bits. I think of him as a presenter; I'd put Betty White in that category as well unless she had another show I don't know about.
Maybe a clearer example...I'd add Carson Daly because of his late-night show on NBC because that was guest-focused for years, but if he'd only hosted "TRL," I wouldn't think of him because he was primarily just playing videos to screaming teenagers and had a guest on for like two minutes. Does that make sense?
So we should probably decide on a concrete definition now...do we want a list of qualifications?
To me, a talk show:
- Has a host or hosts
- Has a live guest or guests, in person or via satellite
- Is recurring; no one-time specials
- Interaction ("talk") with the guest(s) and/or audience is the focus
Maybe if we can agree on a brief list like that, we can put it in the overview.
I actually went off this page, which included Tosh, but yeah his show probably doesn't qualify.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_talk_show_hosts
I'm not sure why that would be complicated, Erica. Two of them are given; it's really just "are there live guests and is talking to them the focus." Identifying a talk show ("chat" show to most non-Americans) should be pretty intuitive for any television viewer. But parameters are still a good thing to have so that a broad project like this -- which is now even broader by internationalizing it -- doesn't become a dumping ground.
So I'm still partial to a very brief list to define it, especially where the names and formats are going to differ between countries. You need something to anchor it.
I'll take Betty White as the example. It would take me reading her bio on Wikipedia in depth & carefully & think through the parameters - which is time & concentration efforts I could be spending on developing her tree. So whatever Wiki says she is - that's the categories I will look for to add to projects.
You wouldn't think to add her in the first place unless you already recognized her as a host. There would never be a Wikipedia trip. Put her in the Entertainment project if you're that strained over it and want to leave it for someone to sort. That project already meets your needs. Not a problem.
This isn't something I want to be difficult about. The objection to having parameters is nonsensical to me, but you two decide. But the fact that we already discussed one entry from Wikipedia (Tosh) and decided he really doesn't fit here shows why giving really simple guidelines to users is important and courteous.