Considering the conclusive evidence that many leading genealogists have provided, and the conclusions they have arrived at pertaining to the ancestry of MaHaRaL of Prague - המהר״ל מפראג [as summarised under the profile of יהודה בן בצלאל הזקן המפורסם] i.e that he WAS NOT descended from יהודה בן בצלאל הזקן המפורסם (and therefore his descent from King David of Israel is thrown into question, see this article-http://chfreedman.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Maharal%20of%20Prague... by Private User) it seems rather strange that this connection is still showing in all its glory here on Geni. I would like to believe that Geni is not just a collection of legends and myths but rather something more substantive. I mean, proof is proof. Let us not bury our heads in the sand.
I don't disagree with Chaim's article. But if I recall there was a more recent article in Avotaynu with a theory that the gravestone had been restored and a mistake added.
Используя Geni, вы соглашаетесь с использованием нами файлов cookie в качестве идентификаторов, а также для обеспечения работоспособности нашего сайта, как описано в нашей Политике конфиденциальности.
Twitter
поставьте нам отметку «Нравится»
Возникла проблема на этой странице?
