All the Ancesrry trees I've seen have her hussband as:
Sir William 2nd Lord Caulfield, Baron of Charlemont Caulfield
So I did some Googling and these sites also have Sir William Caulfield as her husband:
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/169193743/mary-caulfield
https://famouskin.com/family-group.php?name=12256+william+caulfield...
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/King-17578
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L8QN-DNS/mary-king-1601-1658
This one even shows how Mary King and William Caulfield are the 11th great-grandparents of Prince Harry:
https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-chart.php?name=12258+william+caulf...
So I Googled Mary King and Gresham Caulfield and this shows she and William had a son named Gresham, but not the same date of birth as the one attached here as her husband:
Gresham Coffield was born in 1615, at birth place, to Knight William Caulfield and Mary Caulfield (born King). Knight was born in 1587, in Oxford, ...
So there are multiple Greshams and Williams in the family lines but the only husband I could find for Mary King is William, not Gresham
Based on these findings, I'm of the opinion that her husband needs to be corrected.
Thanks.
But there are other problemss that need sorting out. Mary King and her immediate family lived and died in Ireland. There's no way she had son Lt. Col. William Caufield who was born in Vriginia.
Her son Sir William Caufield lived and died in Ireland and somehow the two William Caufields have gotten mixed up. They're definitely from different families.
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/120625327/william-caulfeild%2C_...
So not only is Mary attached to the wrong husband, but
isn't her son if he was born in America.
I think we should disconnect Lt. Col. William Caufield
from his parents and straight fresh trying to document his true parentage
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/93407071/william-caufield
Has no parents listed for him
Wiki has no parents for him but also states he was born in England:
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Caufield-25
Wiki states his father's name was 'probably' Gresham but also states that his parents are unknown at this time, so it's just speculation that his father's name was Gresham and there's not even specualtion about his mother's name.
So the connections as they are now are incorrect and give false pathways on Geni.