Admiral Sir Charles Wager, RN, MP

Sir Charles Wager (24 February 1666 – 24 May 1743) was a British Admiral and First Lord of the Admiralty between 1733 and 1742. Despite heroic active service and steadfast administration and diplomatic service, Wager's reputation has suffered from a profoundly mistaken idea that the navy was then at a low ebb. In reality its numerical preponderance over other navies was greater than at any other time in the century, and its dockyard facilities, overseas bases (Wager was much involved in the development of new bases in the Caribbean), victualling organization, and central co-ordination were by far the most elaborate and advanced. Although British warship design was inferior to French in some respects, the real problem was an insufficiency of the versatile and seaworthy 60-gun ships, a class that Wager's Admiralty had chosen to augment during the 1730s but, as wartime experience would show, not aggressively enough.

Contents [hide] 1 Early life 2 Early naval career (1689–1709) 3 Admiral and diplomat 4 First Lord of the Admiralty 5 The Manning problem 6 Reputation 7 Marriage 8 Final years 9 Death & burial 10 Heirs 11 Philanthropist 12 Obituaries 13 Sources 14 References

[edit] Early lifeBorn in Rochester, Kent, after the death of his father Captain Charles Wager (b. 1630), on 24 February 1666. His father had started life in the merchant service and then gained advancement in the navy of the Commonwealth. His mother was Prudence (b. 1640/41), daughter of Vice-Admiral William Goodson, who became a renowned officer in the navy of the time. Wager remarked in 1731, "On both sides I am related to the navy".[1] His paternal grandfather was John Wager (d. 1656) of St Margaret's, Rochester, who became a mariner after migrating from Charlton Kings, Cheltenham.

His father commanded the Yarmouth in the fleet that brought Charles II to England and quickly proved to be a capable, trustworthy, well-liked officer of the Royal Navy. He dined at the home of Samuel Pepys who remarked in his diary "A brave, stout fellow this Captain is, and I think very honest.".[2] Two years after the elder Wager's death, Samuel Pepys heard a friend who had been at Tangier contrast his conduct with that of others who had served in the Strait of Gibraltar, remarking, as Pepys noted, "that above all Englishmen that ever was there, there never was any man that behaved himself like poor Charles Wager, whom the very Moores do mention with teares sometimes".[3] Prudence re-married after his father’s death to Alexander Parker, a Quaker and London merchant. There was already an older sister, Prudence, and the marriage produced six more children. The young Charles found himself lacking the advantages of patronage and parentage, necessary for advancement in the Royal Navy of that time, due to his maternal grandfather's dismissal from the navy following the restoration and his father’s untimely death.

Wager was apprenticed to a Quaker merchant captain of New England named John Hull of Barnstable, Massachusetts who operated a transatlantic shipping service. Wager's mother was a witness when John Hull married Alice Teddeman in the London Quaker Meeting in 1684. When Dr Teddeman Hull, their oldest son, visited London in 1742 he had a letter of introduction from Governor Richard Ward of Rhode Island which stated that he was "the son of Captain John Hull, late of this colony, under whom Sir Charles Wager was educated".[4] It was while working with the Quaker John Hull that Wager displayed the strength of character that ultimately brought him to the attention of the Navy. During one of many transatlantic voyages the vessel which Hull was commanding with Wager as understudy was waylaid by a French privateer and told to "strike". Hull could not fight due to his religious convictions but equally was loath to surrender his valuable vessel and cargo and so he turned to his right hand man. The young Wager did not share his patron's religion and had no such compunctions, and so it was Wager, "who accepted the encounter, and falling to work with the Frenchman, soon obliged him to sheer off." [5]

[edit] Early naval career (1689–1709)The earliest record of Wager's naval service is his listing as lieutenant of the frigate Foresight on 1 August 1689. By 1691 he had become first lieutenant of the Dreadnought (64 guns). On 8 December that year he married Martha Earning (b. 1664×6, d. 1748), daughter of Anthony Earning, a Commonwealth navy captain who went into the East India Company's service after 1660 and died while captain of the George in the Indian Ocean. Wager was in the Britannia, Admiral Edward Russell's flagship, in 1692, took part in the battle of Barfleur, and was made post captain on 7 June.

The year 1693 saw Wager in command of the Samuel and Henry (44 guns), in which he convoyed the New England trade. He was captain of the Newcastle (48 guns) in 1694, and in 1695, after a month in the Mary, he was re-assigned to the Woolwich (54 guns). In early March 1696 the Woolwich was watching Dunkirk against a rumoured invasion. A month later Wager moved to the Greenwich (50 guns) and commanded a small squadron for convoying the tobacco trade home from the Chesapeake. He stayed in the Greenwich until she was paid off in late 1699. He lived at Watergate cottages, Kilminorth near West Looe on half pay whilst his ship was under repair in Plymouth. He immediately became a freeman of that borough. As he informed the Admiralty in June 1700, his residence was only "about ten miles from his Majesty's Yard at Plymouth" and he could "be at London in four or five days, if required".[6] Eight months later, in February 1701, he was appointed to the Medway (64 guns). In the mobilization of January 1702 for the War of the Spanish Succession he was assigned to the Hampton Court (70 guns) and remained her captain for the next five years. He commanded a squadron of four of the line and two frigates that cruised between Cape Barfleur and the Isle of Batz in early 1703. Later that year he went to the Mediterranean and in October he came under the command of Admiral George Byng (later Lord Torrington). Captains Wager and John Baker were the men Byng sent ashore to carry out negotiations and witness the signing of the England's re-negotiated treaty with the Dey of Algiers. Going again to the Mediterranean in 1704, Wager was with the fleet under Sir George Rooke that captured Gibraltar. The Hampton Court was on detached service and missed the battle off Malaga, but she was present at the capture of Barcelona in 1705. After wintering with Sir John Leake's squadron at Lisbon, Wager took part in the relief of Barcelona and the winning over of Ibiza and Majorca before returning home with Leake in late 1706.

As a senior captain, who had commanded detached squadrons, Wager was a logical choice for the West Indies command. Appointed in January 1707, he left Spithead in the Expedition (70 guns) on 28 March and reached Jamaica on 22 June. A French squadron under Admiral Ducasse was known to be coming from Europe, and Wager's initial deployments were designed to gain intelligence of its arrival and protect trade. He learned in December that Ducasse had gone to Havana, far to leeward; thus the French squadron (ten of the line) could neither surprise Jamaica nor shield the galleons of the Spanish treasure fleet at the isthmus, and if those galleons were to follow their usual practice of returning to Cartagene de Indias before proceeding to Havana, Wager would have a chance to intercept them after they loaded Peruvian silver at Portobelo. The Expedition(70 guns), Kingston (60 guns), and Portland (50 guns) plus a fireship left Port Royal in time to attain, on 23 May 1708, a position about 36 miles west of Cartegena. There followed the action which was later called Wager's Action, in which one treasure ship was destroyed and one was captured, while the others escaped into Cartagena harbour. The proceeds of his capture meant that he returned to England a rich man. He also came home a rear-admiral, the promotion having occurred by seniority on 19 November 1707. His wealth stemmed chiefly from the silver on the captured galleon, its value estimated at over £60,000 in addition to his flag share of other prizes taken in the West Indies. The action against the galleons made him a hero and he was knighted on 8 December 1709. At Portsmouth he was nominated for a by-election to parliament and was elected on 23 January 1710.

[edit] Admiral and diplomatDespite a Tory landslide in the election of 1710 Wager was re-elected to the Portsmouth seat, but the Tory-dominated house overturned the result on petition. As a firm Whig he could no longer expect an important command so he prepared to spend the rest of his life ashore in contrast to the previous twenty years of almost continual sea service. Although there is no record of his residing again at Kilminorth he served as MP for West Looe from 1713 to 1715.

Following the death of Queen Anne, Wager was still listed as a Rear Admiral and he was ordered to take charge of the ships at Portsmouth, and in later to go out to the Strait of Gibraltar and assume command of the Mediterranean Fleet. However, he opted to become Comptroller of the Navy and three years later, in March 1718, he moved to the Board of Admiralty, where he remained for 24 years, almost to the end of his life. In 1720 Wager leased Hollybush, a stately brick house, situated at the south-east corner of Parson's Green, Fulham. He remained on the list of admirals and advanced by seniority. In 1722 he was appointed to take a squadron to Lisbon but the mission was cancelled. His flag was eventually hoisted again in 1726 to take command of a large battle fleet sent to the Baltic to protect Sweden and Denmark from the threat of a recently mobilized Russian fleet. Stopping first at Copenhagen, he met with the court and completed arrangements for co-operation with the Danish navy. His report of 30 April 1726 evoked a glowing response from the secretary of state, Viscount Townshend: "his Majesty has commanded me to let you know from Him, that he was before persuaded you was a very good Admiral, but he now sees that you are likewise an able Minister. All the answers you gave to the questions proposed to you at the Conference with the Danish Council were extremely right."[7] After calling on the Swedish court, Wager took his twenty ships of the line to Reval. He had orders to engage and destroy the Russian fleet if it came out. A frustrated and angry tsarina felt compelled to demobilize it instead. To reassure Sweden the British fleet stayed at Reval all summer, losing many men to sickness, and did not enter the Thames until 1 November 1726. He was at sea again soon afterwards when he arrived off Gibraltar 2 February 1727 with six ships of the line, two cruisers, two bomb-vessels, and additional troops for the garrison. The fleet helped cover the land approaches, Wager ordered two frigates and a bomb-vessel to "the back of the Hill",thus ensuring re-supply for the garrison. Although Britain and Spain were undoubtedly at war the actions were usually cautious and desultory except in early May when there was a furious artillery exchange. It was chiefly a naval war, with prizes taken. The main burden was borne by Francis Hosier's fleet in the Caribbean. The Spanish king agreed to a cessation of arms in mid-June, but gave no indication of actually yielding. Finally, in early March 1728, Spain agreed to a convention and Wager's fleet could be ordered home; he arrived on 9 April after sixteen months abroad.

Wager resumed his regular attendance at the Admiralty board, but again in May 1729 he was ordered to take command of thirty-three ships, which were soon joined by fourteen Dutch. This huge squadron never left Spithead and was popularly ridiculed as the "stay-at-home fleet". It was assembled because the court of Spain was acting as if the convention meant nothing the fleet remained in readiness until it was learned that Spain would sign a firm treaty.

The provisions of this treaty confirmed the Spanish queen's title to certain parts of Italy, a right to install Spanish garrisons was also obtained. It seemed advisable to have a strong British fleet alongside the Spanish when the troops were to be landed at Leghorn. Thus Wager's flag was hoisted on the Namur (90 guns) and the British fleet entered Cadiz Bay on 1 August 1731, and, after much grand entertainment, moved into the Mediterranean. The mission at Leghorn was incident free but much delayed, so that Wager did not return to England until 10 December 1731. Upon arrival he reported his sense of "pleasure to have a success where doubtful".[8] This was to prove his last sea service.

Between April 1726 and December 1731 Wager had spent as many months flying his flag as he spent ashore. The missions he was asked to execute all involved diplomatic discretion as well as strategic acumen. This Leghorn mission was a good example of the duality of role that Wager was capable of.

In 1732, in a letter to a Gloucestershire acquaintance from the Admiralty office, he remarked that for many years he had been inclined to retire. "But", he continued, "I have been sent on several expeditions (not by my own choice), wherein I have succeeded so well, as to have the King's approbation, and very like may be put, in case of a Vacancy, at the head of this Board."[9] Evidently he believed that his elevation, if it occurred, would stem from his dual role as a fleet commander and diplomat, not his long experience in naval administration.

[edit] First Lord of the AdmiraltyWhen Lord Torrington died in January 1733, Under-Secretary Delafaye reported to a colleague: “Every body looks upon Sir Charles Wager as the person who will now be at the head of the affairs of the navy; as indeed I may say he has been for some time”.[10] It seems that Wager's administrative knowledge and talent did matter. The official appointment as first lord was dated 21 June 1733. He was also nominated and elected MP for Westminster in 1734. Besides administrative capacity, Wager brought some important assets to the office. His character as a trusted senior admiral tended to subdue the incipient factions of the officer corps. An example of his candid professionalism was the strong plea he made to leading ministers in December 1738 that Edward Vernon should be given the West Indies command this in spite of Vernon’s unrelenting opposition to him in parliament. He describe himself as a “Parliament man” to Sir Robert Walpole [11] and in Wager Walpole proved to have a personal friend and a staunchly loyal spokesman in the House of Commons who was well liked, well informed, and widely trusted. It seems that when anyone in government needed an opinion on maritime geography, seaborne commerce or colonial circumstance Wager was asked. Many of his responses, most of them written in his own hand, have survived (Vernon–Wager MSS).

[edit] The Manning problemOne of the great unsolved problems of Wager's term in office was the manning of the fleet. In May 1731 Wager had remarked: “we have no difficulty but in getting men; ... our Country being such a free Country, that every man does what he pleases: by reason of which, this Nation will be lossd [sic] one time or other, if it won't admit of a remedy.” [12] Upon the outbreak of the so called “War of Jenkin’s ear” in 1739 the problem rapidly grew severe, and Wager, strongly encouraged by Admiral Sir John Norris, pressed for legislative measures; the government introduced bills to facilitate naval manning and Walpole supported them, but parliament would not pass anything meaningful. The strategy for defeating Spain, insisted the Duke of Newcastle, called for capturing a major objective in the West Indies. This meant that large fleet and army had to be sent to a region where tropical diseases were rife. Wager was not confident, he well knew the price of delay in that climate, his favourite strategy was to threaten the Peruvian coast from the “South Sea”. Hence the famous voyage of Commodore George Anson, who sailed from England in 1740, was a result of Wager's advocacy. Even before the expedition to the west Indies left England the typhus epidemic of 1740, the worst of the century, ravaged newly recruited seamen and spread through the fleet, seriously aggravating the manning problem and delaying departure. Predictably the assault on Cartagena failed mainly because the forces succumbed to further tropical disease. The profound disappointment of a public that had never doubted success was played upon by the fervid opposition to Walpole, and eventually Wager's reputation was injured although this was to occur long after his death.

[edit] ReputationIt has been claimed that the navy was ill prepared for war prior to 1739 and that the lack of preparation was mainly due to Wager’s incompetence because of his age. Typical of these criticisms is repeated in the 1959 History of the British Navy “The leading figures in 1739, at the top because they were old , were Sir Richard(sic) Wager and Sir John Norris” and continuing to refer to Wager “He was seventy four-a great age for those heavy-drinking, smallpox ridden days-and he had not worn particularly well.” [13] These Claims, which seem to have emerged long after his death, can neither be proved nor disproved, but may be doubted. A captain who attended the great debate of 13 February 1741 on whether to petition the king to remove Walpole from office observed: ‘Sir Charles Wager is as Hearty as I ever knew Him, spoke in the motion ... at four in the morning, tho He had been there from seven the morning before’. On that occasion Wager issued a challenge, saying that if there were any mismanagements ‘in the Office of Admiralty, He and the rest of the Board ought to answer it at their own peril, and not Sir Robert’ [14] He was fit enough to command the king's channel crossings in 1740 and 1741. (Wager's decision to turn back to Holland on a stormy night in December 1736 had probably saved the whole entourage.) not too shabby for a supposed smallpox ridden drunk who had not worn very well. Rumours that he was inattentive may be offset by his record of steady attendance at the board, cabinet meetings, in parliament, and by much else. As so often happens in history an abundance of skill is turned, by fate, into the final instrument of downfall. The king insisted on having Wager see him across the water in May 1741 this was unfortunate politically because the voyage coincided with the Westminster election. Wager was still popular and his presence during the polling might have prevented the surprise nomination of Edward Vernon who was in the West Indies and knew nothing about it. As it happened the bailiff pre-emptively closed the poll, thus provoking a riot and inviting a challenge. The fiasco, which culminated in a voiding of the election on a very close vote in the House of Commons, contributed notably to Walpole's loss of parliamentary control and the subsequent resignation by Wager as first lord in January 1742 when it became clear that Walpole was arranging to leave office.

[edit] MarriageOn 8 December 1691 he married Martha Earning (1664/6-1748), daughter of Anthony Earning, a Commonwealth navy captain who went into the East India Company's service after 1660 and died while captain of the George in the Indian Ocean. He left no progeny.

[edit] Final yearsIn December 1742 Wager was appointed Treasurer of the Navy, a handsome sinecure which served as a pension. He remained in parliament, having been elected for West Looe.

[edit] Death & burialHe was reportedly living at Stanley House, Chelsea, when he died, peacefully, on 24 May 1743 and was buried in the north cross of Westminster Abbey on 30 May 1743. In 1747 Francis Gashry, long his right-hand man of business, erected a monument by the artist Peter Scheemakers in Westminster Abbey, and The bas-relief shows his famous naval engagement, with the inscription "The destroying & taking the SPANISH GALLEONS A.D. 1708". Lady Wager died on 7 April 1748 and was buried next to him.

[edit] HeirsHis chief heir was Charles Bolton, son of his sister, Prudence. His widow, Martha, was executor. They had no children, but numerous relatives, many stemming from his half-sisters, all of whom he is said to have helped financially or by appropriate patronage recommendations.

[edit] PhilanthropistWager was known for spreading his generosity very widely, to individuals in need as well as philanthropic organizations, for example he was patron of the “Cockney Feast” held in the east end of London. An inscription on the ninth bell at the church of St Dunstan's, Stepney reads “To the honour of Sir. Chas. Wager Knt., First Lord of the Admiralty 1729, Patron of the Stepney or Cockney's Feast, instituted at Ratcliffin the year 1674, and discontinued 1784. John Matthews, Esq., Treasurer, T. Mears & Sons fecit. 1806.” [15]

[edit] ObituariesWhen Wager died Horace Walpole, first observed that he had “left the fairest character”,[16] a judgement supported by all of the surviving evidence. A remembrance recorded many years later by Arthur Onslow, the respected speaker of the Commons, remains highly instructive:” He was of the most gentle and humane disposition I ever knew, and spent almost the whole he got in generous acts of charity and compassion. I had a long and intimate acquaintance with him, and have seen where his temper has been tried by much provocation, but I never saw him discomposed. He had a very good understanding, great plainness of manners, and a steadiness of courage that no danger could daunt, with the same calmness in it that he shewed in the most ordinary acts of his life. He was indeed a person of most extraordinary worth, and the world bore him a respect that was due to it. His father was a captain of a man of war before the restoration, and very likely after that: but dying when this son was young, and the mother marrying a Quaker, he was bred up among that people; by which he acquired the simplicity of his manners, and had much of their fashion in his speech as well as carriage. And all this, with his particular roughness of countenance, made the softness of his nature still more pleasing, because unexpected at first.” [17]

Sir Charles left most of his estate to his full sister Prudence, who died unmarried and a substantial amount to his "nephew" Burrington Goldsworthy, who must therefore have been a son of one of Sir Charles's half-sisters, and who presumably owed his medium-ranking diplomatic post to Sir Charles's influence and his marriage to the fact that he was an heir to a fabulously wealthy estate.

ConstituencyDatesPORTSMOUTH23 Jan. 1710 - 3 Feb. 1711WEST LOOE1713 - 1715PORTSMOUTH1715 - 1734WESTMINSTER1734 - 1741WEST LOOE1741 - 24 May 1743Family and Education b. c.1666, nr. West Looe,1 posth. s. of Charles Wager of Deal, Kent, capt. R.N., by Prudence, da. of William Goodsonn of Ratcliffe, Mdx., v.-adm. in Cromwell’s navy. m. (lic. 8 Dec. 1691) Martha, da. of Anthony Earning, capt. in Cromwell’s navy, of Limehouse, Mdx., s.p. suc. fa. at birth. Kntd. 8 Dec. 1709.

Offices Held

Lt. R.N. by 1690, capt. 1692; freeman, West Looe 1699; r.-adm. 1708, v.-adm. 1716, adm. 1731; v.-adm. Great Britain 1742; comptroller of the navy Feb. 1715-18; ld. of Admiralty Mar. 1718-33, 1st ld. Jan. 1733-Mar. 1742; P.C. 25 Jan. 1733; treasurer of the navy Dec. 1742-d.

Biography The son of a captain in Cromwell’s navy, described by Pepys as one of the bravest officers he ever knew, Wager was said by the 1st Lord Onslow to have been

of the most gentle and humane disposition I ever knew, and spent almost the whole he got in the most generous acts of charity and compassion ... His father ... dying when his son was young, and the mother marrying a quaker, he was bred up among that people; by which he acquired the simplicity of his manners, and had much of their fashion in his speech as well as carriage. And all this, with his particular roughness of countenance, made the softness of his nature still more pleasing, because unexpected at his first appearance.2 He served in the Mediterranean in 1703-4 with Sir George Byng (q.v.), later Lord Torrington, under Sir Clowdisley Shovel. In May 1708 he intercepted the Spanish treasure fleet off Cartagena, capturing a galleon ‘worth 200,000 pieces of eight’ (about £50,000) in ‘coined and uncoined gold and silver’,3 a large share of which he retained as prize-money. Returning to England a wealthy man, he acquired an estate near his birth place, West Looe, which he represented as a Whig in the 1713 Parliament. Transferring to Portsmouth on the Admiralty interest in 1715, he became a lord of the Admiralty in 1718, making a ‘very short unintelligible’ speech in a debate on the South Sea Company in June 1721.4 Sent with a squadron to the Baltic to prevent a war in the north, he accomplished his mission so successfully that Townshend wrote to him:

His Majesty has commanded me to let you know from him that he was before persuaded you was a very good admiral, but he now sees that you are likewise an able minister.5 His next assignment was to command a fleet off the Spanish coast during the siege of Gibraltar in 1727. Returning to England in April 1728, he took part on 6 May in a debate on a bill for encouraging naval recruitment, in which he opposed proposals of his former subordinate, Edward Vernon (q.v.), for improving the living conditions of seamen, saying ‘it was impossible better care could be taken than was’. On 12 Mar. 1729 he defended the conduct of the Administration in a debate on the Spanish depredations, observing

that the merchants might be mistaken in some things in their complaints, for what was said yesterday at the bar [of the House] was impossible to be true, and as they were not on oath they might say what they pleased.6 He spoke against a proposal for ending the monopoly of the East India Company on 26 Feb. 1730, and next day in a debate on Dunkirk, which he seemed, to the 1st Lord Egmont (q.v.), to treat ‘as a thing of too little consequence’. In a debate on a pension bill on 17 Feb. 1731, he

said he was against all disqualifying bills, that the Act which obliged every member to have an estate at least of three hundred pounds a year in land had disqualified ninety-nine persons of a hundred in the kingdom ... he did not know why gentlemen who had served their country well should be discouraged from sitting in the House; in all other countries they met with regard, but here as soon as the benefit was reaped from their services, they were looked on as the vilest of men.7 At the Admiralty, he was already carrying out the duties of first lord, for

though Lord Torrington had the name and the appearance of it, Sir Charles, by giving way in some things not essential, and by suggesting matters in such a way that the other imagined the first thought was his own, kept all in order, without ever having any squabble. On 12 July 1731 Wager wrote to Walpole:

You are sensible that our chief at the Admiralty can last but a little time longer, and I believe you are sensible that we shall not like to have a man put over us that must be instructed in what he must say when he goes to court; and what mistakes he may make would fall upon us. There are two objections against my being at the head of the Admiralty, if I should chance to outlive the present head; one is that it is necessary the head should be a lord (not an Irish lord) for which ... I may without much vanity, look upon myself as well qualified as some of them ... Indeed I have no estate suitable to that dignity; but a man that is an officer does not like to have anybody put over his head, and if that can be prevented I shall be very well content.8 So as ‘to be able to say’ that he was ‘not altogether an upstart, but descended from an ancient family, though they never had but a small estate’, he claimed kinship with the heiress of the Wagers of Charlton Kings, Gloucestershire, who, suitably plied with presents, was ready to acknowledge the relationship, even consulting him on family matters.9 Thus equipped with a pedigree, he succeeded Torrington as first lord, though he was not given a peerage. A year later, in a debate on the navy, Vernon, censuring English subservience to France, referred to him as

a gentleman ... whose consummate courage, conduct, and generosity had rendered him the darling and glory of his country; what vexation must he have felt in his breast to be forced to submit to those dishonourable orders he received to idle away his time at Spithead in doing nothing for his country’s service but feasting and keeping a Bartholomew fair on board.10 In the winter of 1736, in spite of being ‘very much decayed’ by a recent illness, Wager conveyed George II back to England from Hanover. It was reported that, the weather being bad,

the King had declared if Sir Charles Wager would not sail, his Majesty would go in a packet-boat, that he had told Sir Charles go; and that Sir Charles, in his laconic Spartan style, had told him he could not; that the King had said: ‘let it be what weather it will, I am not afraid’; and that Sir Charles Wager had replied, ‘if you are not, I am’; that his Majesty had sworn he had rather be twelve hours in a storm than twenty-four more at Helvoetsluys; upon which Sir Charles had told him he need not wish for twelve, for four would do his business; and that, when the King by the force of importunity, had obliged Sir Charles Wager to sail, Sir Charles had told him: ‘well, Sir, you can oblige me to go, but I can make you come back again’.11. Appointed one of the plenipotentiaries to adjust differences with Spain in February 1739, he defended the Spanish convention in March.12 After the declaration of war against Spain, in order to relieve the chronic shortage of seamen, he introduced on 5 Feb. 1740 a bill establishing a register of seamen on the French model, which was dropped in face of bitter opposition, but passed next year in a modified form.13 He was beginning to show his age, 74: at a meeting of the cabinet on 28 Apr. 1740 to decide the future destination of the fleet, Hervey describes him as muttering something

most of it so inarticulately, that it seemed like sounds without words, and where the articulation was plain, it seemed words without sense.14 In 1741 Wager stood for Westminster, which he had represented since 1734.

Two days before the election [he wrote to Vernon] ... when Lord Sundon (q.v.) and I dreamed of no opposition, you and Mr. Edwin [Charles, q.v.] were set up ... and, at the election, a poll demanded for you both which continued six days, with such mobs and riots as never were seen before ... I had the good fortune to be obliged to attend the King to Holland the three last days, and returned in five days when the poll was closed, and Lord Sundon and I declared to be duly elected. Pulteney, writing to Vernon of the ‘most scandalous practices and violent acts of power’ made use of by the Administration there, added:

Your friend Sir Charles Wager, had nothing to do in this, which I am heartily glad of, because I esteem him much, and know him to be a very valuable man, extremely amiable in his character of private life, and a well wisher to his country in his public capacity.15 Unseated in one of the critical divisions on election petitions before the fall of Walpole, he took his seat for West Looe, for which he had also been returned. Subsequently the secret committee appointed to inquire into Walpole’s Administration investigated the payment of £1,500 of secret service money by Wager to the high bailiff of Westminster as compensation for being taken into custody of the House and other losses.16 In January 1742 he had an audience with the King during which he ‘begged he might quit his employment, finding age and infirmities had impaired his faculties, to which the King replied, I don’t see that, and you shall serve me on’. He resigned with Walpole on 11 Feb., although he seems to have been the only member of the Admiralty board for whose dismissal the Opposition had not pressed.17 According to Horace Walpole, he refused an invitation to return to the Admiralty a fortnight later,18 but he accepted the treasurership of the navy at the end of the year. He died 24 May 1743, leaving his fortune to his wife.19

Ref Volumes: 1715-1754 Author: Eveline Cruickshanks Notes 1. Hist. Surv. Cornw. i. 38; Burnet, Hist. of his own Time (1833 ed.), v. 390 n. 2. Diary, ed. Wheatley, v. 126; vii. 355. 3. Cal. Treas. Pprs. 1708-14, p. 79. 4. Coxe, Walpole, ii. 218. 5. J. F. Chance, Alliance of Hanover, 343. 6. Knatchbull Diary. 7. HMC Egmont Diary, i. 68, 73, 140. 8. Coxe, iii. 128, 116-17. 9. Glos. N. and Q. i. 35-36, 119-20. 10. HMC Egmont Diary, ii. 17. 11. Hervey, Mems. 637. 12. HMC Egmont Diary, iii. 18; Coxe, iii. 517. 13. 14 Geo. II. c.38. 14. Mems. 927. 15. Original Letters to an Honest Sailor (1746), pp. 38, 43. 16. CJ, xxiv. 331. 17. HMC Egmont Diary, iii. 236; Vaucher, Walpole et la Politique de Fleury, 428. 18. To Mann, 25 Feb. 1742. 19. PCC 184 Boycott.

Other References

• "Charles Wager", Westminster Abbey