He only had two:
1) Margaret widow of Dr. George Clarke - she may or may not have been the daughter of Obedience Robins by an undocumented first wife (the gene pool was so small that step-children marrying each other was not unlikely).
>>> No children are known from this marriage.
2) Dorothy Marriott. Children from this marriage are documented via a Chancery lawsuit in England.
For some reason he's an easy target for people who want to credit him with starting the Philemon Waters line - maybe because he *is* so well-documented and they are not. Recent Y-DNA evidence suggests that there is no relation (the Philemon Waters line has tested R, but the John Waters line of Anne Arundel - presumed relatives of the Edward Waters line - has turned up an I). If this holds up, Col. William Waters isn't the Philemon Waters forefather.
Cleaned up Margaret Waters - *she* isn't fictional, nor her first husband, but any children attributed to her probably are).
Disconnected Margaret Waters and Margaret Waters because they don't belong. More research is needed to determine where - and if - they fit. (Note: middle names were *quite rare* in this time period and usually indicate some sort of Bad Genealogy.)
Disconnected Thomas Waters, [Fictional?] - he probably belongs in the upper reaches of the Philemon Waters line, but exactly where is uncertain. Note that his alleged birth place is *quite impossible* it wouldn't even exist until well into the next century.
This lot, descended from Morgan William Waters (putative son of Margaret Waters) are of particular interest because they have a Y-DNA test result attached.
Unfortunately, it's neither I (Waters of Anne Arundel) nor R (Philemon Waters) - it's J.
That probably means they were a separate emigration to the Province of Carolina (created 1629 but not officially established until 1663, see details at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Province_of_Carolina). Georgia, as such, wasn't carved out of the territory until 1732.
Looks like somebody else wasn't as cautious. "They" are now merged.
don't think we *do* know who his mother was - and even if she was a Margaret (a fairly common name), she probably wasn't a Robins (not so common).
Here we go with the middle names in the middle of the 17th century again. This was still *very rare* except for special circumstances (posthumous son, twentieth child, stuff like that).
"John William Walter Waters, Sr."? Col. William Waters
This guy has been lumbered with way too many names! The first known example of anything like *that*, and it's a mystery to all why his parents did that to him, is "George Robert Twelves/Twelvetrees Hughes", participant in the Boston Tea Party in 1773.