Although royal marriages were an exception...most marriages of the time were conducted twice...once; locally-privately, the other larger and public, and could be years apart...especially in times of war. People tend to forget that Thomas was a beggar 'prince' living off the generosity of the French crown at a time when he was also a mercenary for Spain and other branches of the family were siding with the Hapsburg's and even the Welf's, and the English crown. In a way...Francis would have been at war with his father...and bravo for it. Thomas was a loser, a monster, and the son of a monster that ordered the massacre of women, children, and old people for a bread riot. I'd just as soon not be related to such royal trash. A family that only managed two king-ships, and lost both within no time at all through their greed and incompetence. The proof this family is related to Charlemagne is about the same as Francis's relation to Thomas...less really. I'll take my descent from Charlemagne from my descent from Rolf the Ganger, an apparently loved ruler (except for that beheading two hundred Christians thing when he went mad for a day), so I really don't care about that one way or another...but what I hate is when a family with a mostly made up history of its own starts trashing a deathbed confession without proof. Descendants of Francis need prove NOTHING, the Savoys of Europe only need provide DNA (OFFER THE ONES IN JAIL TIME OFF FOR IT) to prove it wrong. I do not believe for a second that a dyeing Catholic would lie...as far as I (and you should insist on the same) am concerned the ball is in the monster family's court.