"Claypool" and "Claypools in America" by PROFESSOR Evelyn Claypool- Bracken, 6 revised volumes, contain Jeremiah of the South Fork, and the lines of the Osbornes.
Thomas Osborne
1594/5 Ashford Kent, England
Immigrant
Mary Goatley
|
Stephen Osborne 1634
Sarah Stansborough
|
Jeremiah Osborne
Abigail Ogden
|
Jeremiah Osborne
Phoebe Higgens
|
Children:
1. George 1725 m. Annatjnet Hannah Westfall
2. Jeremiah 1729 m. Mary Newman
3. John Osborn 1735 m. Elizabeth Claypool 1739
4. Abigail Osborne m. Joseph Claypool
5. Phoebe Osborne m. Henry
NOTE ABOUT THE DNA: A descendant of George Osborne 1725 married a descendant of the line of John Osborne 1634! That line has all the HYBRID OSBORNES IN IT! The Robinettes cause the delima! A female by the name of Ann Osborne married a Robinette. They had a daughter Mary Polly Robinett. That is from the line of John 1634. When their daughter married----she married a young man from the line of John's brother Stephen 1634. Her husband was George Jackson Osborne. This has caused many an argument about the DNA! You see, prior to them marring John's side is 1 number different than his brother's side of the family! NOW they cause the argument, because the descendants of Mary Polly Robbinete's side of the family CHANGED THE DNA to read as descendants of Stephen Osborne 1634. So RECENTLY some of the researcher are trying to say that Ephraim Osborne 1723 and Caleb 1725 are descendants of Stephen Osborne ONLY BECAUSE OF what Mary Polly Robinette did by marrying into Stephen's line. My argument is: They need to make a time line of when the marriage took place. It is highly improbable that Ephraim 1723 and Caleb 1725 are descendants of Stephen Osborne 1634 BECAUSE the marriage and births of Mary Polly Robinette took place MUCH LATER! Some people can't WRAP THEIR HEADS AROUND THAT! But they don't have critical thinking skills! It is all about the time line, and when that marriage took place!
Problem with this page?
