Pontius Pilate, 5th procurator of Judea

How are you related to Pontius Pilate, 5th procurator of Judea?

Connect to the World Family Tree to find out

Pontius Pilate, 5th procurator of Judea's Geni Profile

Share your family tree and photos with the people you know and love

  • Build your family tree online
  • Share photos and videos
  • Smart Matching™ technology
  • Free!

Pontius Pilate, 5th procurator of Judea

Also Known As: "Ponzio Pilato"
Death:
Immediate Family:

Husband of Claudia Procula
Father of Pilo

Managed by: Private User
Last Updated:
view all

Immediate Family

About Pontius Pilate, 5th procurator of Judea

Pontius Pilatus (Greek: Πόντιος Πιλᾶτος, Pontios Pīlātos), known in the English-speaking world as Pontius Pilate (ˈpɒntʃəs ˈpaɪlət), was the fifth Prefect of the Roman province of Judaea, from AD 26–36. He is best known as the judge at Jesus' trial and the man who authorized the crucifixion of Jesus. As prefect, he served under Emperor Tiberius.

The sources for Pilate's life are the four canonical gospels, Philo of Alexandria, Josephus, a brief mention by Tacitus, and an inscription known as the Pilate Stone, which confirms his historicity and establishes his title as prefect. Based on these sources, it appears that Pilate was an equestrian of the Pontii family, and succeeded Valerius Gratus as prefect of Judaea in AD 26. Once in his post he offended the religious sensibilities of his subjects, leading to harsh criticism from Philo and Josephus. According to Josephus, he was ordered back to Rome after harshly suppressing a Samaritan uprising, arriving just after the death of Tiberius (according to Flavius Josephus' Jewish Antiquities 18.89) which occurred on March 16 in the year 37. He was replaced by Marcellus.

In all four gospel accounts, Pilate appears in association with the responsibility for the death of Jesus. In the Gospel of Matthew, Pilate washes his hands to show that he was not responsible for the execution of Jesus and reluctantly sends him to his death. The Gospel of Mark, depicting Jesus as innocent of plotting against the Roman Empire, portrays Pilate as reluctant to execute Jesus. In the Gospel of Luke, Pilate not only agrees that Jesus did not conspire against Rome, but Herod Antipas, the Tetrarch of Galilee, also finds nothing treasonable in Jesus' actions.

Scholars have long debated how to interpret Pilate's portrayal in the sources. Some Biblical scholars have argued that the Gospel accounts are not historically accurate, with some believing Pilate was a mythical character. The discovery of the Pilate Stone in 1961 is still under debate, but only by present-day scholars who believe that by acknowledging Pilate, they would also be forced to acknowledge the independent contemporary historical records of the life of Jesus of Nazareth by Apostle Matthew, the Disciple Mark, the Apostle John, the physician Luke, the Apostle Paul, and Jude the half-brother of Jesus. So resolute are they to deny the existence of Jesus, those scholars denounce the authenticity of the mention of Jesus by Roman historian Josephus, and deny that the Pilate Stone is proof of Pilate's existence, though there is virtually no valid justification for denouncing these records except by unscientific personal dogma.

Sources