Elizabeth Amber Cocke (Hartwell) - Elizabeth Amber Cocke (Hartwell) parents shows as Robert and Jane Marye Littlebury

Started by Angus Wood-Salomon on Monday, October 6, 2014
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 11 posts

Robert and Jane have a daughter Elizabeth Eppes who I think is the correct Elizabeth, I think there were so many revisions on this profile

There were so many revisions and merges I am guessing her birth name is Hartwell

Can we link this profile to the Cobham tree?

Private User
Can you tell me how the Cobhams are connected to some of these profiles?

Angus Wood-Salomon The link to (Cobham) Wikitree was posted in the description for the profile of Elizabeth Cocke https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Cobham-97 I don't know who added it, but if it is valid, we should connect the trees.

Private User

Would you do me a favor and send me the link to your Elizabeth Cocke

This comment is misleading:

The maiden name of Elizabeth Cocke is Cobham, according to wikitree.com. This Elizabeth Cocke (Cobham) appears to have been the daughter of John Cobham and Katharine Bonville.

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Cobham-9 This Elizabeth was born about 1640. (Note: no real references: This profile was created through the import of indygrandma.ged on 02 January 2011. The following data was included in the gedcom.)

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Cobham-97 This Elizabeth Cobham was born about 1383.

That’s a 250 year difference. So how are they related?

Erica Howton Thank you! This is what I was seeing as well. There are links provided in that profile and they have nothing to do with the Elizabeth Cocke that I am referring to, but they do tell us about the Elizabeth from 1383. I am happy to see some clarification.

Maybe someone can take those references down since they aren't applicable.

Angus Wood-Salomon It would appear so! Too many revisions and inaccurate links.

I see now that it has been edited, thank you.

Showing all 11 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion