Dr. Alfred Adler

Is your surname Adler?

Research the Adler family

Share your family tree and photos with the people you know and love

  • Build your family tree online
  • Share photos and videos
  • Smart Matching™ technology
  • Free!

Dr. Alfred Adler, MD

Hebrew: ד"ר אלפרד אדלר, MD
Birthdate:
Birthplace: Vienna, Wien, Austria
Death: May 28, 1937 (67)
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Immediate Family:

Son of Leopold Leb Nathan Adler and Pauline Adler
Husband of Raissa Timofeyewna Adler
Father of Dr. Valentine Dina Adler-Sas; Alexandra Adler, Dr.; Kurt Alfred Adler and Cornelia Nelly Sternberg
Brother of Sigmund Adler; Hermine Ratz; Rudolf Adler; Irma Fried; Dr. Phil. Max Adler and 1 other

Occupation: Physician, Psychotherapist, Founder of the School of Individual Psychology
Managed by: Randy Schoenberg
Last Updated:

About Dr. Alfred Adler

Alfred Adler (February 7, 1870, Mariahilfer Straße 208, Rudolfsheim, Rudolfsheim-Fünfhaus[1] – May 28, 1937) was an Austrian medical doctor, psychologist and founder of the school of individual psychology.

In collaboration with Sigmund Freud and a small group of Freud's colleagues, Adler was among the co-founders of the psychoanalytic movement as a core member of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society.

He was the first major figure to break away from psychoanalysis to form an independent school of psychotherapy and personality theory. This was after Freud declared Adler's ideas as too contrary, leading to an ultimatum to all members of the Society (which Freud had shepherded) to drop Adler or be expelled, disavowing the right to dissent (Makari, 2008). Following this split, Adler would come to have an enormous, independent effect on the disciplines of counseling and psychotherapy as they developed over the course of the 20th century (Ellenberger, 1970). He influenced notable figures in subsequent schools of psychotherapy such as Rollo May, Viktor Frankl, Abraham Maslow and Albert Ellis. His writings preceded, and were at times surprisingly consistent with, later neo-Freudian insights such as those evidenced in the works of Karen Horney, Harry Stack Sullivan and Erich Fromm.

Adler emphasized the importance of equality in preventing various forms of psychopathology, and espoused the development of social interest and democratic family structures for raising children. His most famous concept is the inferiority complex which speaks to the problem of self-esteem and its negative effects on human health (e.g. sometimes producing a paradoxical superiority striving).

His emphasis on power dynamics is rooted in the philosophy of Nietzsche. Adler argued for holism, viewing the individual holistically rather than reductively, the latter being the dominant lens for viewing human psychology. Adler was also among the first in psychology to argue in favor of feminism making the case that power dynamics between men and women (and associations with masculinity and femininity) are crucial to understanding human psychology (Connell, 1995). Adler is considered, along with Freud and Jung, to be one of the three founding figures of depth psychology, which emphasizes the unconscious and psychodynamics (Ellenberger, 1970; Ehrenwald, 1991).

Contents [show]

[edit]Early life

Alfred Adler was the second child of seven children of a Hungarian-born, Jewish grain merchant and his wife.[2] Early on, he developed rickets, which kept him from walking until he was four years old. He almost died of pneumonia when he was five and it was at this age that he decided to be a physician.[3]

Alfred was an active, popular child and an average student who was also known for his competitive attitude toward his older brother, Sigmund.

In 1895 he received a medical degree from the University of Vienna. During his college years, he became attached to a group of socialist students, among which he found his wife-to-be, Raissa Timofeyewna Epstein, an intellectual and social activist from Russia studying in Vienna. They married in 1897 and had four children, two of whom became psychiatrists.

He began his medical career as an ophthalmologist, but he soon switched to general practice, and established his office in a lower-class part of Vienna, across from the Prater, a combination amusement park and circus. His clients included circus people, and it has been suggested[4] that the unusual strengths and weaknesses of the performers led to his insights into "organ inferiorities" and "compensation".

In 1902 Adler received an invitation from Sigmund Freud to join an informal discussion group that included Rudolf Reitler and Wilhelm Stekel. They met regularly on Wednesday evenings at Freud's home, with membership expanding over time. This group was the beginning of the psychoanalytic movement (Mittwochsgesellschaft or the "Wednesday Society"). A long-serving member of the group, Adler became President of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society eight years later (1910). He remained a member of the Society until 1911 when he and a group of supporters formally disengaged, the first of the great dissenters from Freudian psychoanalysis (preceding Carl Jung's notorious split in 1914). This departure suited both Freud and Adler since they had grown to dislike each other. During his association with Freud, Adler frequently maintained his own ideas which often diverged from Freud's. While Adler is often referred to as a "a pupil of Freud's", in fact this was never true; they were colleagues. In 1929 Adler showed a reporter with the New York Herald a copy of the faded postcard that Freud had sent him in 1902. He wanted to prove that he had never been a disciple of Freud's but rather that Freud had sought him out to share his ideas.

Adler founded the Society of Individual Psychology in 1912 after his break from the psychoanalytic movement. Adler's group initially included some orthodox Nietzschean adherents (who believed that Adler's ideas on power and inferiority were closer to Nietzsche than were Freud's). Their enmity aside, Adler retained a lifelong admiration of Freud's ideas on dreams and credited him for creating a scientific approach to their clinical utilization (Fiebert, 1997). Nevertheless, even with dream interpretation, Adler had his own theoretical and clinical approach. The primary differences between Adler and Freud centered on Adler's contention that the social realm (exteriority) is as important to psychology as is the internal realm (interiority). The dynamics of power and compensation extend beyond sexuality and the arena of gender and politics are important considerations that go beyond libido. Moreover, Freud did not share Adler's socialist beliefs. Trotsky's biography mentions his having discussions with Alfred Adler in Vienna.

[edit]The Adlerian School

Following Adler's break from Freud, he enjoyed considerable success and celebrity in building an independent school of psychotherapy and a unique Personality Theory. He traveled and lectured for a period of 25 years promoting his socially oriented approach. His intent was to build a movement that would rival, even supplant, others in psychology by arguing for the holistic integrity of psychological well-being with that of social equality. Adler's efforts were halted by World War I, during which he served as a doctor with the Austrian Army. After the conclusion of the war, his influence increased greatly. In the 1930s, he established a number of child guidance clinics. From 1921 onwards, he was a frequent lecturer in Europe and the United States, becoming a visiting professor at Columbia University in 1927. His clinical treatment methods for adults were aimed at uncovering the hidden purpose of symptoms using the therapeutic functions of insight and meaning.

Adler was concerned with the overcoming of the superiority/inferiority dynamic and was one of the first psychotherapists to discard the analytic couch in favor of two chairs. This allows the clinician and patient to sit together more or less as equals. Clinically, Adler's methods are not limited to treatment after-the-fact but extend to the realm of prevention by preempting future problems in the child. Prevention strategies include encouraging and promoting social interest, belonging, and a cultural shift within families and communities that leads to the eradication of pampering and neglect (especially corporal punishment). Adler's popularity was related to the comparative optimism and comprehensibility of his ideas. He often wrote for the lay public. Adler always retained a pragmatic approach that was task-oriented. These "Life tasks" are occupation/work, society/friendship, and love/sexuality. Their success depends on cooperation. The tasks of life are not to be considered in isolation since, as Adler famously commented, "they all throw cross-lights on one another".[5]

In his bestselling book, Man's Search for Meaning, Dr. Viktor E. Frankl compared his own "Third Viennese School of Psychotherapy" (after Freud's and Adler's schools) to Adler's analysis:

According to logotherapy, the striving to find a meaning in one's life is the primary motivational force in man. That is why I speak of a will to meaning in contrast to the "pleasure principle" (or, as we could also term it, the will to pleasure) on which Freudian psychoanalysis is centered, as well as in contrast to the will to power stressed by Adlerian psychology.[6]

[edit]Emigration

In the early 1930s, after most of Adler's Austrian clinics were closed due to his Jewish heritage (although he had converted to Christianity), Adler left Austria for a professorship at the Long Island College of Medicine in the USA. Adler died from a heart attack in Aberdeen, Scotland during a lecture tour in 1937. At the time it was a blow to the influence of his ideas although a number of them were taken up by neo-Freudians. Through the work of Rudolf Dreikurs in the United States and many other adherents worldwide, Adlerian ideas and approaches remain strong and viable more than 70 years after Adler's death.

Around the world there are various organizations promoting Adler's orientation towards mental and social well-being. These include the International Committee of Adlerian Summer Schools and Institutes (ICASSI), the North American Society for Adlerian Psychology (NASAP) and the International Association for Individual Psychology. Teaching institutes and programs exist in Austria, Canada, England, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Switzerland, the United States, Jamaica, Peru, and Wales.

[edit]Basic principles

Adler was influenced by the mental construct ideas of the philosopher Hans Vaihinger (The Philosophy of As If / Philosophie des Als Ob) and the literature of Dostoevsky. While still a member of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society he developed a theory of organic inferiority and compensation that was the prototype for his later turn to phenomenology and the development of his famous concept, the inferiority complex.

Adler was also influenced by the philosophies of Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche, Rudolf Virchow and the statesman Jan Smuts (who coined the term "holism"). Adler's School, known as "Individual Psychology"—an arcane reference to the Latin individuus meaning indivisibility, a term intended to emphasize holism—is both a social and community psychology as well as a depth psychology. Adler was an early advocate in psychology for prevention and emphasized the training of parents, teachers, social workers and so on in democratic approaches that allow a child to exercise their power through reasoned decision making whilst co-operating with others. He was a social idealist, and was known as a socialist in his early years of association with psychoanalysis (1902–1911). His allegiance to Marxism dissipated over time (he retained Marx's social idealism yet distanced himself from Marx's economic theories).

Adler (1938) was a very pragmatic man and believed that lay people could make practical use of the insights of psychology. He sought to construct a social movement united under the principles of "Gemeinschaftsgefuehl" (community feeling) and social interest (the practical actions that are exercised for the social good). Adler was also an early supporter of feminism in psychology and the social world, believing that feelings of superiority and inferiority were often gendered and expressed symptomatically in characteristic masculine and feminine styles. These styles could form the basis of psychic compensation and lead to mental health difficulties. Adler also spoke of "safeguarding tendencies" and neurotic behavior long before Anna Freud wrote about the same phenomena in her book The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense.

Adlerian-based scholarly, clinical and social practices focus on the following topics:

Mental Health Prevention

Social Interest and Community Feeling

Holism and the Creative Self

Fictional Finalism, Teleology, and Goal constructs

Psychological and Social Encouragement

Inferiority, Superiority and Compensation

Life Style / Style of Life

Early Recollections (a projective technique)

Family Constellation and Birth Order

Life Tasks & Social Embeddedness

The Conscious and Unconscious realms

Private Logic & Common Sense (based in part on Kant's "sensus communis")

Symptoms and Neurosis

Safeguarding Behaviour

Guilt and Guilt Feelings

Socratic Questioning

Dream Interpretation

Child and Adolescent Psychology

Democratic approaches to Parenting and Families

Adlerian Approaches to Classroom Management

Leadership and Organisational Psychology

From its inception, Adlerian psychology has always included both professional and lay adherents. Indeed, Adler felt that all people could make use of the scientific insights garnered by psychology and he welcomed everyone, from decorated academics to those with no formal education to participate in spreading the principles of Adlerian psychology.

[edit]Adler's approach to personality

Adler's book, Über den nervösen Charakter (The Neurotic Character) defines his earlier key ideas. He argued that human personality could be explained teleologically, parts of the individual's unconscious self ideal work to convert feelings of inferiority to superiority (or rather completeness). The desires of the self ideal were countered by social and ethical demands. If the corrective factors were disregarded and the individual over-compensated, then an inferiority complex would occur, fostering the danger of the individual becoming egocentric, power-hungry and aggressive or worse. Common therapeutic tools include the use of humor, historical instances, and paradoxical injunctions.

[edit]Psychodynamics and teleology

Adler maintained that human psychology is psychodynamic in nature, yet unlike Freud's metapsychology that emphasizes instinctual demands, human psychology is guided by goals and fueled by a yet unknown creative force. Like Freud's instincts, Adler's fictive goals are largely unconscious. These goals have a "teleological" function. Constructivist Adlerians, influenced by neo-Kantian and Nietzschean ideas, view these "teleological" goals as "fictions" in the sense that Hans Vaihinger spoke of (fictio). Usually there is a fictional final goal which can be deciphered alongside of innumerable sub-goals. The inferiority/superiority dynamic is constantly at work through various forms of compensation and over-compensation. For example, in anorexia nervosa the fictive final goal is to "be perfectly thin" (overcompensation on the basis of a feeling of inferiority). Hence, the fictive final goal can serve a persecutory function that is ever-present in subjectivity (though its trace springs are usually unconscious). The end goal of being "thin" is fictive however since it can never be subjectively achieved.

Teleology serves another vital function for Adlerians. Chilon's "hora telos" ("see the end, consider the consequences") provides for both healthy and maladaptive psychodynamics. Here we also find Adler's emphasis on personal responsibility in mentally healthy subjects who seek their own and the social good (Slavik & King, 2007).

[edit]Constructivism and metaphysics

The metaphysical thread of Adlerian theory does not problematise the notion of teleology since concepts such as eternity (an ungraspable end where time ceases to exist) match the religious aspects that are held in tandem. In contrast, the constructivist Adlerian threads (either humanist/modernist or postmodern in variant) seek to raise insight of the force of unconscious fictions– which carry all of the inevitability of 'fate'– so long as one does not understand them. Here, 'teleology' itself is fictive yet experienced as quite real. This aspect of Adler's theory is somewhat analogous to the principles developed in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) and Cognitive Therapy (CT). Both Albert Ellis and Aaron T. Beck credit Adler as a major precursor to REBT and CT. Ellis in particular was a member of the North American Society for Adlerian Psychology and served as an editorial board member for the Adlerian Journal Individual Psychology.

As a psychodynamic system, Adlerians excavate the past of a client/patient in order to alter their future and increase integration into community in the 'here-and-now'. The 'here-and-now' aspects are especially relevant to those Adlerians who emphasize humanism and/or existentialism in their approaches. It also changes the way of how we look at life.

[edit]Holism

Metaphysical Adlerians emphasise a spiritual holism in keeping with what Jan Smuts articulated (Smuts coined the term "holism"), that is, the spiritual sense of one-ness that holism usually implies (etymology of holism: from ὅλος holos, a Greek word meaning all, entire, total) Smuts believed that evolution involves a progressive series of lesser wholes integrating into larger ones. Whilst Smuts' text Holism and Evolution is thought to be a work of science, it actually attempts to unify evolution with a higher metaphysical principle (holism). The sense of connection and one-ness revered in various religious traditions (among these, Baha'i, Christianity, Judaism, Islam and Buddhism) finds a strong complement in Adler's thought.

The pragmatic and materialist aspects to contextualizing members of communities, the construction of communities and the socio-historical-political forces that shape communities matter a great deal when it comes to understanding an individual's psychological make-up and functioning. This aspect of Adlerian psychology holds a high level of synergy with the field of community psychology. However, Adlerian psychology, unlike community psychology, is holistically concerned with both prevention and clinical treatment after-the-fact. Hence, Adler cannot be considered the "first community psychologist", a discourse that formalized in the decades following Adler's death (King & Shelley, 2008).

Adlerian psychology, Carl Jung's Analytical Psychology, Gestalt Therapy and Karen Horney's psychodynamic approach are holistic schools of psychology. These discourses eschew a reductive approach to understanding human psychology and psychopathology.

[edit]Typology

Adler (1956) developed a scheme of so-called personality types. These 'types' are to be taken as provisional or heuristic since he did not, in essence, believe in personality types. The danger with typology is to lose sight of the individual's uniqueness and to gaze reductively, acts that Adler opposed. Nevertheless, he intended to illustrate patterns that could denote a characteristic governed under the overall style of life. Hence American Adlerians such as Harold Mosak have made use of Adler's typology in this provisional sense:

The Getting or Leaning type are those who selfishly take without giving back. These people also tend to be antisocial and have low activity levels.

The Avoiding types are those that hate being defeated. They may be successful, but have not taken any risks getting there. They are likely to have low social contact in fear of rejection or defeat in any way.

The Ruling or Dominant type strive for power and are willing to manipulate situations and people, anything to get their way. People of this type are also prone to anti-social behavior.

The Socially Useful types are those who are very outgoing and very active. They have a lot of social contact and strive to make changes for the good.

These 'types' are typically formed in childhood and are expressions of the Style of Life.

[edit]On birth order

Adler often emphasized one's birth order as having an influence on the Style of Life and the strengths and weaknesses in one's psychological make up. Birth Order referred to the placement of siblings within the family. Adler believed that the firstborn child would be loved and nurtured by the family until the arrival of a second child. This second child would cause the first born to suffer feelings of dethronement, no longer being the center of attention. Adler (1956) believed that in a three-child family, the oldest child would be the most likely to suffer from neuroticism and substance addiction which he reasoned was a compensation for the feelings of excessive responsibility "the weight of the world on one's shoulders" (e.g. having to look after the younger ones) and the melancholic loss of that once supremely pampered position. As a result, he predicted that this child was the most likely to end up in jail or an asylum. Youngest children would tend to be overindulged, leading to poor social empathy. Consequently, the middle child, who would experience neither dethronement nor overindulgence, was most likely to develop into a successful individual yet also most likely to be a rebel and to feel squeezed-out. Adler himself was the second in a family of six children.

Adler never produced any scientific support for his interpretations on birth order roles. Yet the value of the hypothesis was to extend the importance of siblings in marking the psychology of the individual beyond Freud's more limited emphasis on the Mother and Father. Hence, Adlerians spend time therapeutically mapping the influence that siblings (or lack thereof) had on the psychology of their clients. The idiographic approach entails an excavation of the phenomenology of one's birth order position for likely influence on the subject's Style of Life. In sum, the subjective experiences of sibling positionality and inter-relations are psychodynamically important for Adlerian therapists and personality theorists, not the cookbook predictions that may or may not have been objectively true in Adler's time.

[edit]On homosexuality

Further information: Homosexuality and psychology

Adler's ideas regarding non-heterosexual sexuality and various social forms of deviance have long been controversial. Along with prostitution and criminality, Adler had classified 'homosexuals' as falling among the "failures of life". In 1917, he began his writings on homosexuality with a 52-page brochure, and sporadically published more thoughts throughout the rest of his life.

The Dutch psychiatrist Gerard J. M. van den Aardweg underlines how Alfred Adler came to his conclusions for, in 1917, Adler believed that he had established a connection between homosexuality and an inferiority complex towards one's own gender. This point of view differed from Freud's theory that homosexuality is rooted in narcissism or Jung's view of inappropriate expressions of contrasexuality vis-a-vis the archetypes of the Anima and Animus.

There is evidence that Adler may have moved towards abandoning the hypothesis. Towards the end of Adler's life, in the mid 1930s, his opinion towards homosexuality began to shift. Elizabeth H. McDowell, a New York state family social worker recalls undertaking supervision with Adler on a young man who was "living in sin" with an older man in New York City. Adler asked her, "is he happy, would you say?" "Oh yes," McDowell replied. Adler then stated, "Well, why don't we leave him alone."[7] On reflection, McDowell found this comment to contain "profound wisdom". Although, there must be some misunderstanding on Adler's answer. Adler was offering his help only to those who were asking for it in person. His therapy process could be applied only to those who feel themselves in a deadlock, fallen "at the bottom of a well", and are looking for help to get out. Even though, homosexuality was considered as one of the most difficult cases, needing long experience of the psychotherapist and not only many consequent sessions but also long time of personal work by the individual, depending on the "maturity" of his problem. Success could not be guaranteed.

According to Phyllis Bottome, who wrote Adler's Biography after Adler himself laid upon her this task: "Homosexuality he always treated as lack of courage. These were but ways of obtaining a slight release for a physical need while avoiding a greater obligation. A transient partner of your own sex is a better known road and requires less courage than a permanent contact with an "unknown" sex." (...) "Adler taught that men cannot be judged from within by their "possessions," as he used to call nerves, glands, traumas, drives et cetera, since both judge and prisoner are liable to misconstrue what is invisible and incalculable; but that he can be judged, with no danger from introspection, by how he measures up to the three common life tasks set before every human being between the cradle and the grave. Work or employment, love or marriage, social contact." [8]

[edit]Parent education

Adler emphasized both treatment and prevention. As a psychodynamic psychology, Adlerians emphasize the foundational importance of childhood in developing personality and any tendency towards various forms of psychopathology. The best way to inoculate against what are now termed "personality disorders" (what Adler had called the "neurotic character"), or a tendency to various neurotic conditions (depression, anxiety, etc.), is to train a child to be and feel an equal part of the family. This entails developing a democratic character and the ability to exercise power reasonably rather than through compensation. Hence Adler proselytized against corporal punishment and cautioned parents to refrain from the twin evils of pampering and neglect. The responsibility to the optimal development of the child is not limited to the Mother or Father but to teachers and society more broadly. Adler argued therefore that teachers, nurses, social workers, and so on require training in parent education in order to complement the work of the family in fostering a democratic character. When a child does not feel equal and is enacted upon (abused through pampering or neglect) they are likely to develop inferiority or superiority complexes and various accompanying compensation strategies. These strategies exact a social toll by seeding higher divorce rates, the breakdown of the family, criminal tendencies, and subjective suffering in the various guises of psychopathology. Adlerians have long promoted parent education groups, especially those influenced by the famous Austrian/American Adlerian Rudolf Dreikurs (Dreikurs & Soltz, 1964).

[edit]Spirituality, ecology and community

In a late work, Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind(1938), Adler turns to the subject of metaphysics, where he integrates Jan Smuts' evolutionary holism with the ideas of teleology and community: "sub specie aeternitatus". Unabashedly, he argues his vision of society: "Social feeling means above all a struggle for a communal form that must be thought of as eternally applicable... when humanity has attained its goal of perfection... an ideal society amongst all mankind, the ultimate fulfillment of evolution."[9] Adler follows this pronouncement with a defense of metaphysics:

"I see no reason to be afraid of metaphysics; it has had a great influence on human life and development. We are not blessed with the possession of absolute truth; on that account we are compelled to form theories for ourselves about our future, about the results of our actions, etc. Our idea of social feeling as the final form of humanity - of an imagined state in which all the problems of life are solved and all our relations to the external world rightly adjusted - is a regulative ideal, a goal that gives our direction. This goal of perfection must bear within it the goal of an ideal community, because all that we value in life, all that endures and continues to endure, is eternally the product of this social feeling."[10]

This social feeling for Adler is Gemeinschaftsgefühl, a community feeling whereby one feels he or she belongs with others and has also developed an ecological connection with nature (plants, animals, the crust of this earth) and the cosmos as a whole, sub specie aeternitatus. Clearly, Adler himself had little problem with adopting a metaphysical and spiritual point of view to support his theories. Yet his overall theoretical yield provides ample room for the dialectical humanist (modernist) and separately the postmodernist to explain the significance of community and ecology through differing lenses (even if Adlerians have not fully considered how deeply divisive and contradictory these three threads of metaphysics, modernism, and post modernism are).

[edit]Publications

Alfred Adler's key publications were The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology (1927), Understanding Human Nature (1927) and What Life Could Mean to You (1931). In his lifetime, Adler published more than 300 books and articles.

The Alfred Adler Institute of Northwestern Washington has recently published a twelve-volume set of The Collected Clinical Works of Alfred Adler, covering his writings from 1898-1937. An entirely new translation of Adler's magnum opus, The Neurotic Character, is featured in Volume 1. Volume 12 provides comprehensive overviews of Adler's mature theory and contemporary Adlerian practice.

Volume 1 : The Neurotic Character — 1907

Volume 2 : Journal Articles 1898-1909

Volume 3 : Journal Articles 1910-1913

Volume 4 : Journal Articles 1914-1920

Volume 5 : Journal Articles 1921-1926

Volume 6 : Journal Articles 1927-1931

Volume 7 : Journal Articles 1931-1937

Volume 8 : Lectures to Physicians & Medical Students

Volume 9 : Case Histories

Volume 10 : Case Readings & Demonstrations

Volume 11 : Education for Prevention

Volume 12 : The General System of Individual Psychology

[edit]Other key Adlerian texts

Adler, A. (1956). The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler. H. L. Ansbacher and R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Adler, A. (1964). Superiority and Social Interest: A Collection of Later Writings. H. L. Ansbacher and R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Phyllis Bottome (1939). Alfred Adler - A Biography. G. P. Putnam's Sons. New York.

Phyllis Bottome (1939). Alfred Adler - Apostle of Freedom. London: Faber and Faber. 3rd Ed. 1957.

Carlson, J., Watts, R. E., & Maniacci, M. (2005). Adlerian Therapy: Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Dinkmeyer, D., Sr., & Dreikurs, R. (2000). Encouraging Children to Learn. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.

Dreikurs, Rudolf (1935): An Introduction to Individual Psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co.Ltd. - New edition 1983: London & New York: Routledge, ISBN 0415210550.

Grey, L. (1998). Alfred Adler: The Forgotten Prophet: A Vision for the 21st Century. Westport, CT: Praeger. ISBN 0275960722

Handlbauer, B. (1998). The Freud - Adler controversy. Oxford, UK: Oneworld.

Hoffman, E. (1994). The Drive for Self: Alfred Adler and the Founding of Individual Psychology. New York: Addison-Wesley Co. ISBN 0201632802

Lehrer, R. (1999). Adler and Nietzsche. In: J. Golomb, W. Santaniello, and R. Lehrer. (Eds.). Nietzsche and Depth Psychology. (pp. 229–246). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Mosak, H. H. & Di Pietro, R. (2005). Early Recollections: Interpretive Method and Application. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415952875

Oberst, U. E. and Stewart, A. E. (2003). Adlerian Psychotherapy: An Advanced Approach to Individual Psychology. New York: Brunner-Routledge. ISBN 1583911227

Orgler, H. (1963). Alfred Adler: The Man and His Work: Triumph Over the Inferiority Complex. New York: Liveright.

Josef Rattner (1983): Alfred Adler - Life and Literature. Ungar Pub. Co. ISBN 0804459886.

Slavik, S. & Carlson, J. (Eds.). (2005). Readings in the Theory of Individual Psychology. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415951682

Manès Sperber (1974). Masks of Loneliness: Alfred Adler in Perspective. New York: Macmillan. ISBN 0026129507

Stepansky, P. E. (1983). In Freud's Shadow: Adler in Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press. ISBN 0881630071

Watts, R. E. (2003). Adlerian, cognitive, and constructivist therapies: An integrative dialogue. New York: Springer.

Watts, R. E., & Carlson, J. (1999). Interventions and strategies in counseling and psychotherapy. New York: Accelerated Development/Routledge. ISBN 1560326905

Way, Lewis (1950): Adler's Place in Psychology. London: Allen & Unwin.

Way, Lewis (1956): Alfred Adler - An Introduction to his Psychology. London: Pelican.

West, G. K. (1975). Kierkegaard and Adler. Tallahassee: Florida State University.

[edit]See also

Style of life

Will to power

[edit]References

^ Prof.Dr.Klaus Lohrmann "Jüdisches Wien. Kultur-Karte" (2003), Mosse-Berlin Mitte gGmbH (Verlag Jüdische Presse)

^ "Alfred Adler Biography". Encyclopedia of World Biography. Retrieved 10 February 2010.

^ Personality Theories – Alfred Adler by Dr. C. George Boeree

^ Personality Theories – Alfred Adler by Dr. C. George Boeree citing Carl Furtmuller, 1965

^ The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler, 1956, edited by H. L. Ansbacher, R. R. Ansbacher, pp. 132–133

^ Frankl, Viktor. (1959). Man's Search for Meaning. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press; also, Seidner, Stanley S. (June 10, 2009) "A Trojan Horse: Logotherapeutic Transcendence and its Secular Implications for Theology". Mater Dei Institute. pp 10-12.

^ Manaster, Painter, Deutsch, and Overholt, 1977, pp. 81–82

^ "Alfred Adler - A Biography", G.P.Putnam's Sons, New York (copyright 1939), chap. Chief Contributions to Thought, subchap. 7, The Masculine Protest, and subchap. 9, Three Life Tasks, page 160.

^ Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind, Alfred Adler, 1938, translated by Linton John, Richard Vaughan, p. 275

^ Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind, Alfred Adler, 1938, translated by Linton John, Richard Vaughan, pp. 275–276

[edit]Notes

Adler, A. (1938). Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind. J. Linton and R. Vaughan (Trans.). London: Faber and Faber Ltd.

Adler, A. (1956). The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler. H. L. Ansbacher and R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Dreikurs, R. & Soltz, V. (1964). Children the Challenge. New York: Hawthorn Books.

Ehrenwald, J. (1991). The History of Psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.

Ellenberger, H. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious. New York: Basic Books.

Fiebert, M. S. (1997). In and out of Freud's shadow: A chronology of Adler's relationship with Freud. Individual Psychology, 53(3), 241-269.

King, R. & Shelley, C. (2008). Community Feeling and Social Interest: Adlerian Parallels, Synergy, and Differences with the Field of Community Psychology. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 96-107.

Manaster, G. J., Painter, G., Deutsch, D., & Overholt, B. J. (Eds.). (1977). Alfred Adler: As We Remember Him. Chicago: North American Society of Adlerian Psychology.

Shelley, C. (Ed.). (1998). Contemporary Perspectives on Psychotherapy and Homosexualities. London: Free Association Books.

Slavik, S. & King, R. (2007). Adlerian therapeutic strategy. The Canadian Journal of Adlerian Psychology, 37(1), 3-16.

Gantschacher, H. (ARBOS 2007). Witness and Victim of the Apocalypse, chapter 13 page 12 and chapter 14 page 6.

Reference:

About Dr. Alfred Adler (עברית)

אלפרד אדלר (7 בפברואר 1870 - 28 במאי 1937) היה רופא יהודי אוסטרי, ומייסד הפסיכולוגיה האינדיבידואלית.

חייו

אדלר נולד בשנת 1870 בווינה למשפחה יהודית מהמעמד הבינוני. היה השני מבין שבעת הילדים של לאופולד אדלר (1922-1833), סוחר דגנים שמוצאו מקיטזה, בורגנלנד (אז חלק מהונגריה) ושל פאולינה בר (1906-1845), ילידת טרביטש (מורביה). הוא סבל בילדותו מרככת והיה חולני ומוגבל ביכולתו לשחק עם ילדים אחרים. מוגבלותו זו עוררה בו תחושת נחיתות ביחסיו עם אחיו וחבריו, שהמריצה אותו להשקיע את מאמציו בלימודים כפיצוי על נחיתותו. בגיל חמש חלה בדלקת ריאות קשה והרופאים ניבאו שימות, אך אדלר הצליח להתגבר עליה. התנסות זו יחד עם מותו של אח קטן ממנו גרמו לו להחליט שמטרת חייו היא להפוך לרופא. אדלר הכיר בהשפעה הרבה של זכרונות הילדות שלו על עיצוב חייו, ונראה כי נודעה להם השפעה רבה גם על תורתו. כילד העריץ את אחיו הבכור, זיגמונד אדלר (יליד פינפהאוס על יד וינה, 1868) שעשה קריירה מוצלחת בתחום המסחר ורצה להצליח כמוהו. אלפרד היה הילד המועדף של אביו, איש חרוץ ואסרטיבי, בעוד קשרו עם האם היה פחות אמיץ.

את לימודי התיכון עשה אדלר בגימנסיה הרנאלזר ברחוב קלוואריינברגגאסה (כיום "גימנסיה הרנאלזר גבלרגאסה") ועבר שם את בחינות הבגרות בשנת 1888.

בשנת 1895 השלים את לימודיו באוניברסיטת וינה והוסמך לעסוק ברפואה. במהלך לימודיו השתייך לקבוצת סטודנטים סוציאליסטים, שם הכיר את האקטיביסטית הרוסייה ראיסה אפשטיין, לה נישא ב-1897 במוסקבה. נולדו להם ארבעה ילדים, שניים מהם הפכו לפסיכיאטרים בבגרותם. עם סיום לימודיו באוניברסיטה, עסק אדלר תחילה באופתלמולוגיה, אחר כך עבר לרפואה כללית ופתח קליניקה משלו ברובע השני, לאופולדשטאט, ברחוב פראטר 44, לא רחוק מהפראטר הווינאי, בשכונה שבה חלק ממטופליו חיו בתנאי עוני. ההיכרות עם מטופלים אלה חיזקה בו את אמונתו בחשיבות הגורמים הסוציו-כלכליים ביישום מקצועות הבריאות. ב-1901 הצטרף אדלר, בעקבות הצעה של זיגמונד פרויד, לקבוצת דיון שהתקיימה בביתו של פרויד מדי שבוע, ועסקה בפסיכואנליזה. כך עבר אדלר לעסוק בפסיכותרפיה. הוא נמנה עם החברים המרכזיים באגודה הפסיכואנליטית של פרויד, וב-1910 אף התמנה לנשיא האגודה, אך בשנת 1911 התפטר מהנשיאות בעקבות מחלוקת עם פרויד.

ב-1912 ייסד אדלר אסכולה חדשה ששמה הפסיכולוגיה האינדיבידואלית. אסכולה זו גורסת כי על האדם להשתתף מעשית בטיפול בעצמו וכי רק שינוי באדם עצמו והכרה שלו בחולשותיו תוך רצון עז מצדו להתגבר עליהם, יובילו להרגשה בריאה יותר.

במלחמת העולם הראשונה שירת אדלר כרופא בצבא האוסטרי. בשנים הבאות גברה השפעתו, הוא פתח מספר קליניקות לטיפול בילדים והדרכת הורים, והרצה במוסדות אקדמיים רבים באירופה ובארצות הברית.

בשנת 1932 נסגרו רוב הקליניקות של אדלר באוסטריה, בשל מוצאו היהודי (אף על פי שהתנצר). בשנת 1935, בעקבות התגברות האנטישמיות באוסטריה, היגר אדלר לארצות הברית, שם המשיך בעבודתו הטיפולית והאקדמית. הוא נפטר מהתקף לב בשנת 1937 באברדין שבסקוטלנד.

משנתו של אדלר

משנת אדלר נבנתה בהשראת הפילוסופיה של עמנואל קאנט כפי שהבין אותה, מתוך הראייה שהסובייקטיבי הוא האובייקטיביות היחידה, כלומר שהמציאות שאליה נחשף האדם ואשר מלווה את חייו היא מה שהתקבל מנתוני החושים וניסיון החיים שלו, דרך העיבוד של תפיסת העולם וצורת החשיבה שלו.

המציאות של האדם היא המציאות הרלוונטית היחידה, כשהאדם משתנה המציאות משתנה. המציאות יכולה להיות מעוצבת על ידי האופן בו אנו מגדירים אותה, האדם מפנים את משמעות המלים שהוא בחר כדי לתאר את המציאות וגוזר מכך השלכות נוספות.

העקרון המרכזי במשנתו של אדלר הוא העיקרון של הבחירה החופשית, האדם יכול לבחור את האופן בו יפרש את המציאות ועקב כך (היות שהסובייקטיבי הוא האובייקטיבי) הוא בורא את המציאות שהוא בוחר.

בנקודה זו נבדלת תורתו של אלפרד אדלר באופן מהותי מתורותיהם של יונג ופרויד הממוקדים יותר בעבר ורואים את האדם כבעל פחות אפשרויות. הגישה הטיפולית של אדלר ממוקדת בפתיחת אפשרויות, לאפשר לאדם לברוא לו תפישת מציאות שיש בה יותר אפשרויות ומשרתת יותר את מטרותיו.

הנחות היסוד מול המציאות תורת אדלר מדגישה את חשיבותן של הנחות היסוד במפגש של האדם עם המציאות, היא מבדילה בין הנחות יסוד הפותחות אפשרויות לכאלה הסוגרות אותן. לדוגמה: הנחת יסוד הפותחת אפשרויות כמו "לטעות זה טבעי, מותר לי לטעות" מאפשרת הוויה בריאה יותר מאשר הנחת היסוד המגבילה שבאמירה "טעות היא כישלון, היא דבר שיש להימנע ממנו".

סביבה פחות קשוחה בתביעותיה תאפשר גדילה של אדם גמיש יותר שיכול להרשות לעצמו ליפול ולקום. האדם מפתח את היכולות שזמינות לו, מי שלא נחשף בתקופה המעצבת של ילדותו לאפשרות ליפול לא יידע לעמוד בכך מאוחר יותר.

עקב כך יש חשיבות למיפוי הנחות היסוד של האדם. במסגרת הטיפולית ניתן לגלות הנחות יסוד לא הכרחיות על ידי עימות של גישתו של אדם עם גישות של אחרים: לתאר מצב ותגובה ואז לשאול "מה אתה היית עושה במקרה כזה?", הצגת מספר אפשרויות לתגובה מצביעה על אי-הכרחיותה של הנחת היסוד וגם מצביעה על אפשרות ספציפית חלופית לראות את הדברים. ניתן לעמת הנחות יסוד גם עם העובדה שיש מי שחי אחרת, יש מי שפועל בהתוויות שלכאורה יוצאות מכלל אפשרות על פי הנחת היסוד. האדם יכול לבחור אילו הנחות יסוד יאמץ לעצמו על פי מאזן הרווח והפסד שמלווה כל אחת ולבחור את זו שפחות תגביל אותו.

כאמור כשיש יותר אפשרויות, כשהמציאות של האדם פתוחה יותר, הוא חי חיים שלמים ובריאים יותר.

אמירות של "צריך" ושל "אין ברירה" הן בדרך כלל הנחות יסוד מגבילות. חינוך פותח ומאפשר הוא חינוך המציב את האפשרויות כאופציות ("אפשר") ולא כהכרח ("צריך"), כעניין של בחירה, הילד לומד לפעול לעבר מה שהוא בחר ולא לעבר מה שנכפה עליו, הוא לומד לקחת אחריות, בונה חיים של פעולה ואנרגטיות.

אפיוני האדם

האדם מתאפיין בנקודות הבאות:

חברתיות סובייקטיביות מטרתיות בחירה הוליזם. האדם הוא יצור חברתי ולא ניתן להבין אותו ואת מניעיו בלי לקחת בחשבון את הפן החברתי שבו, ובלי מימוש של הפן הזה ייקשה עליו להגיע להגשמה עצמית וסיפוק עמוק מחייו. הראיה שלו סובייקטיבית, הוא רואה את המציאות דרך הפילטר של תפיסת המציאות שלו שגורמת לפרשנות שונה למצבים נתונים מאדם לאדם.

האדם ממוקד מטרה, מטרותיו משתנות ממצב למצב ומאדם לאדם אך בכל סיטואציה יש לפעולה שלו מטרה. אפילו במצב המוקצן של פסיביות ותלותיות יש לאדם מטרה, והיא המטרה שמאחורי הבחירה בפסיביות.

בתהליך ההליכה אל המטרה כמו בכל תהליך אחר יש לאדם בחירה, הוא לעולם לא סגור בתוך אפשרות דטרמיניסטית אחת ויש לו תמיד האופציה לשנות ולהשתנות. הוליזם פירושו שהאדם ניתן להבנה רק אם לוקחים בחשבון את כל מרכיביו, הוא בלתי ניתן להפרדה ולפיכך הוא תמיד אחראי למעשיו, מעשה לעולם אינו תולדה של חלק מסוים מהאישיות.

מכל אלה יוצא שהאדם תמיד אחראי למעשיו, הם תמיד תולדה של הבחירה שלו, אמורים לשרת את המטרות שלו ונובעים מאישיות שהיא כולית ולא נפרדת ולא ניתן לתלות את האחריות בגורם נפרד כזה או אחר של האישיות.

למעשה גם במצב של חוסר שפיות האדם אחראי למעשיו, הוא פועל לנוכח עיוות של ראיית המציאות או ניתוק מההיגיון הכללי, והשאלה העומדת גם בפניו היא "מה אני עושה עם זה?"

אדלר לעומת פרויד

בניגוד לפרויד וחסידיו שהדגישו את דחפי המין והבלתי מודע הדגיש אדלר את הגורם החברתי ואת הבחירה החופשית. על מנת להבין את האדם הוא נותן מקום מרכזי לניתוח הרקע המשפחתי והחברתי שממנו צמח ובו הוא פועל.

אדלר מטעים תפיסה הוליסטית של האדם כמכלול אחד. אדלר לא מקבל את החלוקה של נפש האדם למרכיבים דוגמת איד, אגו, ליבידו וסופר אגו, מבחינתו כל אלה הם שמות שרירותיים למאפיינים פנימיים של נפש אחת בלתי מתחלקת של האדם.

בעוד שמרכז תשומת הלב של פרויד נמצא בעברו של האדם, עם הניסיון להבין את האירועים שעברו עליו בילדותו המוקדמת, אלפרד אדלר מתמקד באפשרויות שבפני האדם, בעתיד שלו, בפעולה שלו הנובעת מיכולת הבחירה החופשית בכל מצב.

נחיתות ועליונות

שני מושגים אלו הם מושגי יסוד המאפיינים את תורתו המוקדמת של אדלר. עם זאת בהמשך דרכו פיתח אדלר גישה אחרת, אשר איננה נשענת על מושגים אלו, ואשר הוא ראה כיסודית ומשמעותית יותר. גישה מאוחרת זו היא הבסיס של רוב הגישות ה"אדלריאניות" הנפוצות כיום.

לפי התאוריה המוקדמת של אדלר האדם נולד עם תחושת נחיתות ובמשך כל חייו הוא נאבק להשיג עליונות, עצמאות, חופש והגשמה עצמית. אדלר מבחין בין סוגים שונים של רגשי נחיתות:

נחיתות אישית היא נחיתות שחש האדם מול זולתו. נחיתות קבוצתית, אדם חש שהעם, העדה, הקבוצה המקצועית, שבתוכם הוא מצוי נחותים. נחיתות אוניברסלית, האדם חש את מגבלותיו של המין האנושי. לדעת אדלר, בעוד שהתמקדות בנחיתות האישית מזיקה, שכן תיקון יכול לבוא על ידי הפחתת ערך הזולת, התמקדות בנחיתות האוניברסלית היא אידיאלית. דרך משל, אדם הממציא תרופה למחלת הסרטן מתגבר על חוסר האונים של המין האנושי מולה ומפצה על הנחיתות האוניברסלית. האופן שבו אדם מתמודד עם נחיתויותיו קרוי סגנון חיים. האופן שבו האדם מתנהג בחברה, העניין החברתי שלו, יכול להעיד האם הוא פועל בכוונה לרמוס את הזולת או לשתף עמו פעולה.

הגותו המאוחרת

הגותו המאוחרת של אדלר הדגישה אלמנטים של שלמות והגשמה עצמית ובכך התקרבה לפסיכולוגיה ההומניסטית. דברים שכתב גם הופכים אותו למבשר של "גישת הנראטיב" בפסיכולוגיה, הגישה העוסקת באופן שבו אדם מספר לעצמו את סיפור חייו.

הורות וחינוך בתחום החינוך ההורי היה אדלר בעל השפעה רבה. על תפיסתו מתבסס מכון אדלר בישראל.

אדלר סבר כי ההורות צריכה לשאוף לפצות על נחיתותו של הילד, מתוך אהבתו וקבלתו. עם זאת, פינוק יתר עלול להביא את הילד להתעלם מההכרח שיש עליו לפעול בעצמו מול נחיתותו.

התאוריה של אדלר הביאה למחקר אמפירי בעיקר בנושא סדר הלידה במשפחה. בתחום זה נמצא למשל ש-21 מתוך 23 האסטרונאוטים האמריקנים הראשונים היו בנים בכורים.

https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%93_%D7%90...

view all

Dr. Alfred Adler's Timeline

1870
February 7, 1870
Vienna, Wien, Austria

Year 1870
Numerative 114
Code 1
Volume Fünfhaus
Last Name Adler
First Name Alfred
Parents/Annotation Leopold/Beer Pauline

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1951-25797-3278-22?cc=2028...

1898
August 5, 1898
Vienna-9, Austria
1901
September 24, 1901
Czerningasse 7, Vienna-2, Austria
1905
February 25, 1905
Vienna, Vienna, Austria
1909
October 18, 1909
Vienna, Vienna, Austria
1937
May 28, 1937
Age 67
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK