Philippe II de Lévis, vicomte de Lautrec

-http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/toulcentw.htm#PhilippeLevisLautrecd...

1. PHILIPPE de Lévis (-after 1 Oct 1346). Vicomte de Lautrec. “Beatrix vicomtesse de Lautrec” promised not to dispose of her assets without the consent of “ses fils...Philippe et Bertrand de Lévis”, with the consent of “...vicomte Guillaume cousin de lad. dame”, by charter dated 28 Nov 1326, and committed to pay certain sums to her sons “pro custodia castri [de La Focz]” where she was living by charter dated 29 May 1327[428]. “Beatrix vic. de Lautrec” ordered her subjects to swear allegiance to “nos fils Philippe et à Bertrand” by charter dated 21 Mar 1335 (O.S.)[429].

m firstly (early Sep 1309) ELEONORE d’Apchier, daughter of GUERIN [V] d’Apchier Seigneur d’Apchier & his second wife Gausserande de Narbonne (-after 18 Aug 1330). Père Anselme records her parentage, marriage date, the acknowledgement by her brother Guérin Seigneur d’Apchier relating to her dowry dated 14 Sep 1329, and her testament dated 18 Aug 1330[430].

m secondly (1336) JAMAGUE [Janiague?] de Roche-en-Régnier, daughter of GUIGUES Seigneur de Roche-en-Régnier & his second wife Guyotte de Posquières Dame de Bellegarde et de Broussan (-after 24 Jan 1360, bur Montpellier Dominican church). Dame de Roche-en-Régnier. Père Anselme records her parentage, marriage date, and her testament dated 3 Aug 1359 in which she chose her place of burial[431]. The testament of "Jamage de Roche veuve de Philippe de Lévis vicomte de Lautrec", dated 3 Aug 1359, appointed “Bertrand de Lévis fils dudit Philippe et d’elle” as her universal heir, substituting "son autre fils Guigonet"[432]. "Janiague de Roche vicomtesse de Lautrec veuve de Philippe de Lévis jadis vicomte de Lautrec" granted “la moitié du lieu de Porsan” to "Guigue de Lévis vicomte de Lautrec seigneur de la baronnie de Roche son fils", reserving the usufruct to herself and after her death to “son autre fils Bertrand”, by charter dated 24 Jan 1359 (O.S.)[433]. The Roche-en-Régnier succession was disputed as shown by the following document: by charter dated 2 Jun 1369, "Guillaume seigneur de Tournon chevalier, héritier universel de feu Eudes de Roche dit de Tournon, et Bernard de Lévis seigneur de Florensac agissant au nom de Philippe de Lévis sire de Roche son pupille" agreed to respect the arbitration of their dispute, under which “ledit Guillaume” claimed that “feu Guigue seigneur de Roche” had in his testament substituted “le second enfant mâle d’Alix sa fille dame de Tournon” for “son fils” and that, on the death of that son without male heirs during the lifetime of “Eudes deuxième fils de ladite Alix, Philippe de Lévis aurait néanmoins occupé ladite succession dont lui, son fils Guigue de Lévis et son petit-fils Philippe auraient joui”, while Bertrand maintained that “son pupille et les prédecesseurs dudit Philippe” had succeeded to the seigneurie de Roche by right[434].

  Philippe & his second wife had two children: