William de Bermingham, II

Not the same as Sir William ‘Fitz-Richard’ de Bermingham, 5th Lord Athenry

https://www.stirnet.com/genie/data/british/bb4fz/bzmisc07.php

• Peter de Bermingham (a 1165)
  • 1. William de Bermingham (d Evesham 04.08.1265) m. Isabel de Astley (dau of Sir Thomas de Astley)
    • A. William de Bermingham (a 1295)
      • i. William de Bermingham the first mentioned by TCP (Bermingham) m. Maud
        • a. William de Bermingham, Baron (a 1327)
          • (1) Fulk de Bermingham (a 1360) m. Joan
            • (A) Sir John de Bermingham (dsp before 1393) m. (before 03.07.1356) Elizabeth de la Plaunche (b c1347, dsp after 01.09.1423, dau of William de la Plaunche of Haversham by Elizabeth, dau of Sir Roger Hillary of Bescot)

(B) Sir Thomas de Bermingham TCP identifies Sir Thomas's wife just as Isabel Whitacre. Thanks to a contributor (OWC, 28.01.08) for reporting that 'A History of the County of Warwick' (Vol 4, 1947) identifies her as ... m. Isabel Whitacre (dau of John de Whitacre by Amice, dau of Sir Robert Marmion by Isabel)
(i) Elizabeth de Bermingham m. Thomas de la Roche of Castle Bromwich

<De Birmingham family From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The de Birmingham family held the lordship of Birmingham in England for four hundred years and managed its growth from a small village into a thriving market town. They also helped invade Ireland and were rewarded with the Barony of Athenry. They were stripped of most of their lands in England by the notorious John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland, who held sway over Edward VI during the early 16th century

Link between Ausculph and the de Birminghams

Some sources claim that the de Birminghams are descended from William Fitz Ausculph and some sources refute this.

The flow of large parts of the Fitz-Ausculph estate to the Paganells lends itself to the theory that William Fitz Ausculph died with no surviving male heirs and so gave his lands to his daughter and her Paganell heirs.
According to a poem a later William de Birmingham was descended from the Ausculphs via a marriage to the Paganells.According to William Hutton's An History of Birmingham another William de Birmingham claimed in 1309 to have had ancestors who had the right to have a market in Birmingham before the Norman Conquest which would indicate that they were an old Anglo-Saxon family and not Norman.

Some sources claim the right to hold a market in Birmingham was granted to a Peter Fitz William, Steward of Dudley, and not to Peter de Birmingham who was known as Steward of Gervais Paganell. At this time people could be known by more than one name so it is probable that Peter de Birmingham and Peter Fitz William were one and the same person.
Fulk Paganell has been tenuously claimed to have had several children, one of whom is said to have been called William. It is feasible that William would have been given a small part of the Paganell lands, e.g., Birmingham, while his older brother Ralph received the rest. This could have led to William Paganell becoming known as William de Birmingham
https://gw.geneanet.org/foullon?lang=en&pz=alessio+alain+heribert+d...

William de BIRMINGHAM, De Burmingham Born about 1265
Deceased about 1335, aged about 70 years old

Parents
William de BERMINGHAM, De Burmingham, deceased after 1265
Married to
Isabel de ASTLEY , De Astley

Spouses, children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren
Married to sosa Maud Ne with
M William de BERMINGHAM, De Burmingham †1336/ Married to sosa ? ? with
M Fulk de BIRMINGHAM, De Burmingham ca 1314-1373/ Married to Joan Ne with :
M Thomas de BIRMINGHAM, De Burmingham Matilda de BIRMINGHAM, (BIRMINGTON) De Burmingham †1326/ Married to Fulke (II; Folke) de PEMBRUGGE, De Pembridge ca 1294-1326 with
M Robert (Knight; de) PEMBRUGGE, ou Robert PEMBRIDGE, De Pembridge †ca 1364 Married to Juliana (la) ZOUCHE, Lady of Harringworth, La Zouche ca 1325-1349/ with :
Elizabeth PEMBRUGGE, De Pembridge
Juliana (de) PEMBRUGGE, ou Juliane de PEMBRIDGE, Lady de Vernon, (ou) Dame de Vernon, De Pembridge ca 1349-1409