Follow Us
Be a Fan
| Birthdate: | |
| Death: | (Date and location unknown) |
| Occupation: | Farmer |
| Managed by: | Lea Herbst |
| Last Updated: | |
e10 Abraham Benjamin * 16.4.1815 = Graaff-Reinet 23.4.1815 † Ermelo 17.9.1887 x Cradock 24.1.1836 Anna Francina ROETS xx Susanna Maria DE JAGER † Kafferspruit, Ermelo 21.3.1896 (84.-) wed. Fourie en d.v. Lodewyk de Jager en Engela Adriana van Niekerk
f2 Johannes Nicolaas Rudolph x Elizabeth Daniellina Maria Gouws
Personal Details
Name: Mr Johannes Nicolas Rudolf Joubert
Born in camp? No
Died in camp? No
Gender: male
Race: white
Marital status: married
Nationality: Transvaal
Occupation: farmer
Registration as head of family: Yes
Unique ID: 81798
Camp History
Name: Middelburg RC
Age arrival: 57
Date arrival: 06/05/1901
Date departure: 01/08/1902
Destination: Left for farm
Tent number: I 750
Farm History
Name: Doornkop
District: Middelburg
Notes: own a portion
Status
Type: Surrendered
Notes: Aug 1900
Relationships
Mr Johannes Nicolas Rudolf Joubert
is the husband of Mrs Johannes Nicolas Rudolf Joubert
is the father of Mr Joachim Jacobus Joubert
is the unknown of Master Pieter D Joubert
is the father of Miss Elizabeth Danilina Joubert
is the father of Miss Rachel Cornelia Joubert
Sources
Title: DBC 83 Middelburg CR
Type: Camp register
Location: National Archives, Pretoria
Reference No.: DBC 83
Notes: p. 117
| 1844 |
1844
|
|
|
| 1865 |
May 12, 1865
Age 21
|
|
|
| 1867 |
May 12, 1867
Age 23
|
|
|
| 1870 |
July 21, 1870
Age 26
|
|
|
| 1874 |
December 8, 1874
Age 30
|
|
|
| 1877 |
May 27, 1877
Age 33
|
|
|
| 1882 |
August 21, 1882
Age 38
|
|
|
| 1885 |
February 28, 1885
Age 41
|
|
|
| 1887 |
December 18, 1887
Age 43
|
|
|
| 1901 |
1901
- 1902
Age 57
|
South Africa
Middelburg camp presents a problem in trying to understand why so many people died in the camps. It was the largest camp in the Transvaal system, reaching over 7,000 inmates at one point, and the reports of Dr Kendal Franks and the Ladies Committee suggest that it was very badly run. Dr Franks was critical of the layout of the camp and complained that the administration was ‘lax’, while the Ladies Committee thought it ‘one of the most unsatisfactory we have seen’.1 An intake of over 3,000 in May 1901 brought in desperately impoverished and debilitated people, which precipitated disease. By all these criteria the mortality in Middelburg ought to have been amongst the worst in the system, yet this was not the case, as a comparison with Mafeking camp shows. Indeed, apart from the May peak (a pattern which appeared in almost all the camps) mortality was little worse than the camp average, which was a record few camps achieved. |