Hi Joke,
I also have the Warlop set, no need to post photos, I'm doing that in the overview, just point out the issue. We're working on the whole tree, it's most complicated so I'm in and out of every profile many times. I try to note that a profile is a work in progress hoping that it avoids the awkward comments seen above.
Carl is collaborating and has full oversite on this effort, any duplicates created will be merged before we complete and the overview section for each profile will contain the sources, Warlop being primary to 1300 with support by many others. Please see the bibliography posted for this effort under Rasse 1 here: Rasse I (1062) of Gavre, lord of Gavere, baron of Flander, viscount of Ypres, crusader
Regarding the reference to Medlands, while we don't disregard Mr. Cawley, his input on this family is completely different from Warlop, he also has a completely different numbering system. Please see the initial discussion regarding the issues involved and how we intend to resolve them here: Good Day all...https://www.geni.com/discussions/249273?msg=1561385
I've also added other discussions below (that no one had yet read) regarding issues involved with specific issues encountered in this project, any reasonable discussion with solutions is encouraged.
Did Erasmus II (Lodewijk) van Gavere marry Estrude d’Aquitain de Carcassonne? https://www.geni.com/discussions/249377?msg=1562030
dite Nassau? For Raase I (1062-1096) https://www.geni.com/discussions/249502?msg=1562533
The parentage of Catherine de Cysoing? https://www.geni.com/discussions/249541
Who is Yolanda de Gavre https://www.geni.com/discussions/249480
Which Agnes married Baudouin, châtelain d’Ypres https://www.geni.com/discussions/249714
A few words regarding Eve dit “Damison” van Chièvres, héritière de Chièvre https://www.geni.com/discussions/249805
Detaching incorrect sources https://www.geni.com/discussions/249910
Also, I wanted to let you know that I've encountered a couple of profiles where you have added an image from Warlop and I've removed the image from the profile photo but not deleted it, it remains in the media tab where it can be enlarged and read. I've also developed the plan where the Warlop images of seals have a place in the overview section of the profile for which they support. A few of them require an explanation for clarity that they could not receive as a profile photo.