Anders Toxværd - Fejl

Started by Private User on Friday, September 2, 2022
Problem with this page?

Participants:

  • Private User
    Geni Pro
  • Glædelig Jul 1892. Ali 2. og Nissen. Hanne's oldeforældre Ursille og Sofus hund Ali 2. Privateje Hanne Abel
    Private User
    Geni Pro
  • L.P. Nielsen
    Private User
    Geni Pro
  • Private User
    Geni Pro

Profiles Mentioned:

  • Claude David. Licens: Materialet er fri af ophavsret [
    Geni member
Showing all 11 posts

Alle sted data i profilen er forkerte

Glædelig Jul 1892. Ali 2. og Nissen. Hanne's oldeforældre Ursille og Sofus hund Ali 2. Privateje Hanne Abel

I know, there is a mistake, and the other siblings were corrected long ago, but I was waiting for Hiromimarie’s reply to my questing: Is it ok, that a non-manager starts correting and adding incorrect dokuments without links to profiles?
Best regards, Hanne Abel.

Glædelig Jul 1892. Ali 2. og Nissen. Hanne's oldeforældre Ursille og Sofus hund Ali 2. Privateje Hanne Abel

Correction: Instead of “adding incorrect documents without links to profiles?” Adding incorrecting documents without links to sources?

ALLE STED DATA I DENNE PROFIL ER FORKERTE

Eskildstrup er en medbrændt ejendom som lå i

Boeslunde sogn

Slagelse Herred

Sorø Amt

Glædelig Jul 1892. Ali 2. og Nissen. Hanne's oldeforældre Ursille og Sofus hund Ali 2. Privateje Hanne Abel

Marion!
Jeg har for snart længe siden fundet de rigtige data til Anders Toxværd, idet jeg simpelthen googlede og fandt et helt slægtstræ med hele familien og de rigtige data. Desuden er familiens, stamtræ, folketælling at finde på DIS Danmark i en bog.

Som tidligere skrevet, afventer jeg svar fra Hiromimarie, om det er i orden, at en anden bruger, en bruger der ikke er administrator, går i gang med ændringer på profiler, inden indtasteren er færdig med familien.
Du havde lagt en bid af en artikel på profilen, der skulle forestille at være en kilde, men uden links til artiklen dette fungerer ikke som kilde, er altså ingen dokumentation, og slet ingen hjælp.

L.P. Nielsen

Hej Kirsten
Tak for dit indlæg. Opretteren af diskussionen skrev på dansk.
Jeg skrev høfligt og konkret, stilet til opretteren af diskussionen.
Venlig hilsen Lars

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Kirsten
Thank you for your post. The creator of the discussion wrote in Danish.
I wrote politely and to the point, addressed to the creator of the discussion.
Best regards, Lars

L.P. Nielsen

Hi Kirsten, I sent a message.
Didn't want your translations. Include your intentions and desires for conflict.

Readers of messages must make up their own minds.
I don't want to enter into one of your many discussions on Geni. Have a nice Sunday,
Regards, Lars

Private User -
Has Hiromimarie’s replied to your question yet?

On Geni, not being a Manager does not mean you have any less right to edit a profile than any other Manager of the Profile has.
However, I understand you wanting to get the official word from the official authority.

If Hiromimarie has not yet answered your question, feel free to post the question in https://www.geni.com/discussions/245980 which is a Discussion to get help from Curators
Either
1) just ask the question there,

or
2) post the question, state when you asked Hiromimarie, tell them you have not gotten an answer, and ask what you should do.
(Over a month and a half to get a simple answer re: Geni's policy seems too long to me. Hopefully you got the answer long ago and you are not still waiting on it)

This has been a constant discussion with Hanna and a couple of others that think they have ownership above others on Geni. It is in fact also something that has been told them is the case. It is also what I write above in Danish. No one has more rights than others to a profile unless it is your immediate family or private sphere.

Anette Guldager Boye - re: "No one has more rights than others to a profile unless it is your immediate family or private sphere."
Geni has programmed in more rights over any profile in one's Max Family (except often those also a Geni user) - Max Family being those within the maximum one can set one's Family Group to - found in Account Settings under News & Notifications in "Family Group" (basically, back to third great grandparent, out to 4th cousin, and current spouse of each, but really plus a bit I have not digested yet)
I do not believe Geni has programmed in any more rights over one's immediate family than over anyone else in one's Max Family.
Are you aware of any?

I always follow the policy within my Max Family that whoever is more closely related has the right to make the decision when it comes to matters of taste - for example, if someone has gone by a variety of names, which goes in the Name Fields, which in AKA, is anything formally entered in Display Name -- there certainly can be a Public Discussion about this, but if a consensus cannot be reached, I will honor the wishes of the more closely related and I expect them to respect my wishes when it comes to my branch
But I do not know if Geni has any official policy about this or even about immediate family

Have you seen any place where Geni states an official policy with regard to immediate family? And if so, what definition do they give for "immediate family"?
I know, confusingly to me, by "close family" they mean "Max Family"

By "private sphere" as a place one has more rights - what do you mean?

Just to be clear - the "more rights over any profile in one's Max Family" are 1) the right to add oneself as a Manager and 2) the right to remove as manager anyone not also in the Profile's Max Family
And that presently is all, I believe.

Showing all 11 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion