Frances (Porter) Emery - Unlikely daughter of Nathaniel Porter

A previous message pointed out the problem with giving Frances' maiden name as Porter and assigning her as a daughter of Nathaniel Porter. I'm surprise this problem has not been corrected.

Fwiw, a note from WikiTree: "Frances is named "my wife Frances" in her husband's will of May 1660. Her surname Porter, as a daughter of Nathaniel Porter of Ipswich, is assumed from a publication of Judith Elaine Burns, titled The Revised Genealogical Records of the Descendants of John Emery of Newbury, MA (Baltimore) 1982, Great Migration states there was no Nathaniel Porter of Ipswich."

Even a little critical thought should tell us that a 1982 genealogy should not give license to "assume" she was a Porter, and the citation to Great Migration that there was no Nathaniel Porter of Ipswich, should be a red flag. Geni pushes the problem further back by having Nathaniel Porter coming from Romsey, Hants., but without a single source in support.