The present profiles on Geni show William Harbord (William Harbord) born Norwich 2 April 1797 and Elizabeth Bultitude (Elizabeth Harbord) born Martham, Norfolk on 7 Sept 1800.
William & Elizabeth were married in Martham, May 1814. A citation to this effect is attached to Elizabeth's profile.
If these are correct, Elizabeth would be only 13 y.o at her marriage, and while marriage of minors was not all that unusual in these times, a 13 y.o. is unlikely to be married by any Curate.
Elizabeth's death is stated as Aug, 1842, in Martham, whoever further investigation has found that this person was buried as El;izabeth Bultitude, and not Elizabeth Harbord (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/253701174/elizabeth-bultitude). The woman buried in Aug 1842 is said to have been born in Martham in Sept. 1800, the same date as that of the Elizabeth Bultitude on Geni
This brings into question as to whether we are dealing with the correct William Harbord, and definitely Elizabeth.
William Harbord
Further searching has revealed a number of William Harbord's born in the Great Yarmouth district:-
1792 - North Walsham,
1792 - Martham
1794 - Catfield,
1794 - Martham,
1797 - Norwich,
1793 - town unknown, but buried Martham 1819
1793 - town unknown, but buried Martham 1793
I have looked at the marriage citation for Elizabeth & William to find that both were designated as OTP (of this Parish (Martham)), suggesting that the 1792 birth to Thomas & Susan, and the 1794 birth to Thomas & Susannah are most likely our man?
Elizabeth Bultitude
Presently, the 1800 birth, which is proven not of the Elizabeth in question, is the only record that can be sourced.
There are several genealogies on FamilySearch suggesting Elizabeth was born in Martham in 1793, but no citations to this effect are available.
All that could be concluded from this investigation is that the existing Geni tree is most likely in error for both parties
