Tuta von Ungarn von Formbach, queen of Hungary

-http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/BAVARIAN%20NOBILITY.htm#TutaFormbac...

b) [TUTA . Proof that Heinrich [I] [von Formbach] had a daughter named Tuta seems shaky. It depends on the interpretation of two documents, the first of which is the Codex Traditionum of Formbach monastery which records a donation by "domna Himildrudis filia Hessonis"[468], and the second the same source which records a dispute with Suben monastery and names "due…sorores Touta et Himildrud…nobilissimis"[469]. The basis for assuming that "Hesso" is the same person as "Heinrich [I]" is unclear.] same person as…? TUTA (-2 Feb or 14 Mar [after 1070]). "Tuta von Formbach" is shown as the wife of Péter King of Hungary in Europäische Stammtafeln[470]. No primary source has been identified which indicates either the marriage of King Péter to "Tuta" or Tuta's parentage. As shown below, there are late references to a "Queen Tuta" having founded the monastery of Suben (near Schärding in Upper Austria), one of which states that she was "queen of Hungary". No primary source has been found which links "Queen Tuta" with Tuta, joint founder of Vornbach monastery together with her sister Himiltrud, whose father "Hesso" is assessed by Wegener to have been the same person as Heinrich [I] [von Formbach]. Wegener says[471] that "Queen Tuta" was the second wife of Béla I King of Hungary, the marriage having taken place after the death of his first wife which he dates to "after 1052" (Europäische Stammtafeln suggests that King Béla's first wife died "after 1059"[472]). He bases his argument on connections with the monastery of Suben founded in 1040. He explains[473] that Archbishop Eberhard (von Sulzbach) names "Tuta" (in a document dated 1153, more than a century after the events) as "die Gründerin von Suben, Königin", and that in an even later document from the monastery she is called "Königin von Ungarn", although it cannot be concluded from these documents that she was queen at the date she founded the monastery. He then highlights a connection between possible descendants of King Béla's daughter Sophia (by her first husband Ulrich Marchese of Istria) and the same monastery which, he suggests, indicates that Sophia was the daughter of "Queen Tuta". The chronology of his argument is shaky as Sophia must have been born before [1050], when King Béla's known Polish wife appears still to have been alive. Who, then, was "Queen Tuta" and who was her husband? The existence of a "Queen Tuta" is confirmed by the necrology of Regensburg Monastery which records the death "IV Non Feb" of "Tuta regina"[474], although this gives no indication of the country involved or the date of her death. Assuming that Tuta was queen of Hungary, and that she lived during the mid-11th century, her possible husbands are King Péter, King Sámuel Aba, King András I and King Béla I. The last-named is unlikely, as shown above. His brother and predecessor, King András, is recorded as having married a Russian princess. This leaves King Sámuel and King Péter. Nothing is known of the wife of the former, but considering his probable date of birth it is likely that he was married before his accession in 1041, in which case his wife was most likely a Hungarian noblewoman. This leaves King Péter, a possibility which Wegener apparently ignores. There appears no factual basis for the speculation that "Queen Tuta" was the wife of King Péter, although the necrology of Regensburg St Emmeran which records her death also includes a reference to the death "III Kal Sep" of "Petrus Ungariorum rex"[475]. An alternative explanation for the Suben connection would be that Sophia was the daughter of King Péter and Tuta. However, contemporary political realities suggest that a prominent marriage for a daughter of the disgraced King Péter is unlikely. Until more information comes to light, it is safer to assume that Sophia was the daughter of King Béla and [Ryksa] of Poland, that another (so far unidentified) factor explains the apparent connection between Tuta and Sophia through Suben monastery, and that Tuta was the wife of King Péter. This last conclusion suggests that it is even less likely that Tuta's parentage was as suggested in Europäische Stammtafeln. If the marriage took place before Péter's accession, it is difficult to explain why the son of an ex-Doge of Venice (his father had been deposed in 1026) would marry the daughter of an obscure Bavarian noble. If the marriage occurred after Péter became king, it seems likely that his supporters would have been able to arrange a more prominent marriage for their new ruler, particular as his sister was married to the Markgraf of Austria soon after his accession. No primary source has been identified which throws light on the year of Tuta's death. Assuming that her husband's second marriage is correct, she must have died many years before the "after 1070" which is suggested by Europäische Stammtafeln[476].

m [as his first wife,] PÉTER King of Hungary, son of PIETRO OTTONE Orseolo Doge of Venice & his wife Maria [Grimelda] of Hungary ([Venice] [1010/15]-[30 Aug] [1060], bur Pécs, St Peter's Cathedral).

-http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuta_von_Formbach
Tuta von Formbach († nach 1090) war als zweite Gemahlin König Bélas I. Königin von Ungarn.

Tuta war die Tochter von Graf Heinrich I. (Hesso) von Formbach († 1030) und von Himiltrud. Nach dem frühen Tod ihres einzigen Bruders Hermann († 1030) richtete Tuta in der Mitte des 11. Jhds. in der Burg Suben, die auch eine St. Lamberts-Kirche enthielt, ein weltliches Kollegiatsstift ein,[1] das ihr Urenkel Bischof Altmann von Trient 1126/1142 neu gründete.[2] (Ihre Schwester Himiltrud vollzog ein Gleiches mit der Burg Formbach.)

Nach 1059 wurde sie die zweite Gemahlin des ungarischen Königs Béla I.

Nachkommen

• Lambert († 1095), Herzog in Südungarn
• Sophia († 1095), 1. ∞ Ulrich I., Markgraf von Krain, 2. ∞ Magnus, Herzog von Sachsen