• Join - It's Free

Please do NOT merge unsourced duplicates into the MEDIEVAL tree

Started by Sharon Doubell on Friday, July 29, 2016
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Related Projects:

Showing 5551-5580 of 8255 posts

Unsure about this profile and parent conflict:
Edmund Wright

hi PRO Janet
very bad idea to merge millennial DUP abandoned
( https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=82581741880 )
especially in areas of blocks, where in the least of the hypothesis that does not require conflict cleaning, it often go to mess up maybe some multilingual fields..
.without considering that sometimes, on some unattended node it can remain there in an unfinished merge conflict even for years. *

now don't worry a (C) will cancel and with a single button isolate that handful of profiles for the delete ..
..only if you find more, please report them to (C) here first ^^

---------

*example need work 2 generation under, on 2021 merge on Nicole de SACQUESPÉE
( https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=79889089080 )
by user Johan Hefer

for example look at this which looks like a harmless merge:
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=79889080830

one has the numbering on the middle name, the other on the suffix.. someone merge and stay there for years, before a decent admn notices it .. and this is nothing:
-around space-time I saw with my own eyes, numbering " I " on the name merged with numbering " I "on the middle name became " I I "..
-or the numbering of the name, ending in the suffix (following the contemporary custom), but merging get confused with the numbering of the extended medieval title of the suffix.
-etc etc

PRO Craig Andrew Miles
PLZ read above..
(C) undo.. cut .. https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=82596743360 usual things

/!\ damn what a mess -_-

Sorry Livio, but I dont understand your point as it's clearly the same person and is one step closer to solving the mess that someone else caused resulting in duplicate parents and a conflict that needed resolving.
There are still conflicts that need resolving, yes, as a consequence (often the case) which I can go ahead and also resolve.

I am curious to know what approach would you have suggested in the circumstances - deleting or disconnecting the duplicate profiles?

If you feel that you have the solution then go ahead, but reversing the merge that I did would not eliminate the mess on its own.

PRO.. reread more carefully, starting from the title line. TNX

(C) take care of your professionals please.. here the mess is branching out everywhere even with fantasy links that I'm highlighting with the usual JPG -_-

Livio Scremin

I am afraid you are going to have to communicate more clearly if you want me to enter into a discussion with you that ends up with me taking some action. Perhaps you would like to message me away from this discussion forum?

.

< Please do NOT merge unsourced duplicates into the MEDIEVAL tree >
-https://media.geni.com/p14/3d/88/d0/57/534448618cda41de/pros__origi...

OK, but as I repeat, I didnt.

no problem a few hours of unpaid work, and as you can see if you can read the "edit TABs" (C)Erica has already settled everything (again).

now Craig Andrew Miles PLZ check your:
--> https://www.geni.com/list/tree_conflicts?order=&amp;direction=&amp;...
..and ask for help on this forum if you have and/or find other medieval DUP conflicts.

(don't worry it happens all the time:)

Some off dates here, but can this merge still be correct? https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000076385227881?return=match...

(C) DUP piece cutted yesterday by @Gustav but not yet isolated and reported for cancellation: -Adele van Leuven, DUP TREE don't merge
(stray mine for the next noob to come: PLZ now send it for deletion)

"self-righteous"!? Craig Andrew Miles PLZ choose your words of thanks more carefully. ..i.

SOLVED: https://media.geni.com/p14/3d/88/d0/57/534448618cda41de/pros__origi...

Private User Does anyone know Scottish family history from the 1400s to help this guy.? I think he thinks the wrong John Bruce is inserted into this family. Maby it's actually something else related to the linked profiles. See the profile discussion - there are 3. Thanks
Sir John Bruce, 5th Baron of Clackmannan & Rait

hi Private User
try see if in this new again same DUP line of Bartan Bagatur, DUP TREE
there is the ADMN you are looking for :)

that goes up for 18 generations..
& Chagatai Khan, DUP go down for 7 generation

this other abandoned conflict takes 1 month..
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=82427159600

continue below on triple conflict of Khan Tuqay Timur Khan Borjigin dynasty

& please note that it is the 2021 last merge that with the Cyrillic display name goes to cover the international name :D
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=82426867020

..but why does the username PRO Private User not ring new again to me ? :D

hi PRO Roger Thauland
PLZ check your:
-https://www.geni.com/list/tree_conflicts?order=&amp;direction=&amp;...
..and ask for help on this forum for your medieval DUP conflicts.

I need a second opinion on this potential merge from the 1600's & even though the data seems to be similar; the 2 different trees seem to be in conflict... Thanks ever so much!

https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000186453960851?return=match...

@Carolyn Yes, but the merge is not only one: 8 to complete, not even so branched, and not even in the armored area.. (if you merge them 8 all, the conflict is resolved:)

Can someone with more knowledge take a look at these proposed merges? They look legitimate to me, but I don't know anything about the period or familys.
https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000083868597174&amp;src=...

SOLVED this 2022: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ajRwG1rX_EjGtT4_3pwpk7ah5ZghfOqm/v... (come on spiteful elf, change this too:)
but the knot has a lot of other old surprises:
*https://www.geni.com/discussions/254872?msg=1587011

This profile seems to have a wrong merge with family relations also wrongly merged: Peder Christensen Lerup
Can someone have a look and undo what is needed?

Maybe this has been suggested before, but can pre-1500 be locked, and only credentialed people be able to unlock and merge in the file?

Phillip Duane Finney That’s sounds like a great idea but unfortunately extremely difficult if not impossible to do.
How do you define “credentialed people”?
Users would just leave dates off the profile.
There are lot of pre 1500 profiles not yet on Geni (ie other countries)

half page 186 https://www.geni.com/discussions/158450?msg=1586895
of high medieval PRO problems still unperformed.

Unsourced wife added last year to Malcolm 9th Thane of Lennox:
Malcolm Drummond, 9th Thane of Lennox
Unsourced wife's profile:
(Mary Maragaret) de Graham

https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=80005408990

Mary Margaret de Graham came in with this merge.

Showing 5551-5580 of 8255 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion