"And historians do not contribute with any credibility on Medieval genealogy and therefore are not credible or trustworthy sources as you claim. After having read the work of many modern historians on Medieval Ages - I have come to the conclusion that most of them are are trying to make a name for them selves ."
And that just proved my point. You are set in your ways and are not even willing to think that anyone except you have the correct view.
"Specially since Archeology has in so many cases established or provided proof of what is written in the old sources." Maybe you should read https://www.vfk.no/globalassets/vfk/dokumenter/kultur/kulturarv/lit... (you need to use Chrome to read it, and it is written in norwegian). The main point being that all of the mounds in Borre believed to belong to Ynglingesaga kings, more or less have been proven to belong to the wrong time (they are not from 800-900 but from 600-700) so almost all of them have been proven to not be what Snorre Sturlasson wrote in his saga about the Norwegian kings in that period.
Please, Anna Kristin, before you make any claim, please be up to date on the newest research before you say something. And, yes, I have no authority over you and what you believe, but at least I'm trying to keep my knowledge up to date on what the historians, archeologists and linguistics are saying about the timeperiod 800-1100 in Norway, while I feel that you are just set in your ways.
You can find most of the references in the article I linked to above. I have found them by using archives, library searches and google searches.
I know what these Professionals have written, since I have infact read what they wrote in each article or book. And you just think they wrote this to make a name for them selves. Shame on you for not being an openminded critic but just being set in presumptuous mind.
That you are not able to change your mind when new trustworthy information are being presented before it is proven by DNA testing is a major fault in your reasoning. Our job as genealogist are to prove connections beyond almost any doubt.with the trustworthy sources we have. In the last 30 years Snorre Sturlasson's writings about the Norwegian kings has been thought to be more fictional than facts in the parts from around year 1000-1015 and earlier. And that is something we should recognize. We need to adapt to new knowlegde and not be set in our stubborn ways
Our job in our genealogy is not to prove what is wrong, but to prove what is correct. The sagas in the period we are talking about is not being proved as correct according to the professionals of today. That is something we as a collaborative genealogical site need to acknowledge. We do not have the liberty to show what our personal feelings are, but we need to show what the common and up to date knowledge is saying.