Fulk Davis (Davy) - All children not from Goody, his first wife

Started by Private User on Friday, July 21, 2023
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 17 posts

It has been very well established that not all of his children are from Goody.

What citations can you add to profiles?

He was accused of having adulterous affairs, that produced children, before he was accused of the latter, that got him to go to Leon Gardiner. I have done my homework.

Can the citations be added to profiles though?

I would have to dig through paperwork, may take some time. S.R. Smith

Would be great to get the tree better.

Yes I would love to see the citations. The research I've done suggested the opposite. Foulk and Goody (first wife) produced all children together. Foulk didn't even mary Mary Dayton until after Goody Davis died in 1657/58 and Ralph Dayton died in 1658/59.

Foulk was never accused of adultery. He, in fact, was accused of masturbating in public, an ancient ritual for planting that was supposed to bring about better crops. I have all of the court documents that prove it. I also wrote my Master's thesis on the Goody Garlick witch trial in which Foulk and Goody Davis were involved.

See for example:
Connecticut Historical Society and the Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut. Records of the Particular Court of Connecticut 1639-1663. Hartford, 1928.

Gardiner, Johnathan T., Jonathan Baker, Joseph S. Osborne. Records of the Town of East Hampton, Long Island, Suffolk Co., N.Y. With Other Ancient Documents of Historic Value, Vol. I. Sag Harbor, N.Y.: John H Hunt, Printer, 1887.

… an ancient ritual for planting that was supposed to bring about better crops.

Is this part of the association with Goody Garlick? In other words, were they practicing old rituals looked suspiciously upon as witchcraft?

Gardiner, Baker, Osborne, and Hunt concocted false data for the public to view. On account of some of those children that Fulk and "Goodwife" Davis were raising were not their own.
Discount any information that cannot be verified by an un interested party. Because these people had an interest in what information was to be broadcasted to the public in Connecticut. They were the ones that put the "spin", on the truth.

"Goody" Davis is believed to first have coerced her, "husband" after catching him in adulterous affair to arrange for adoption of children that most probably have dowries, or possible inheritances from their family.

Example, Haynes(sic) HAINES is part of research for two daughters that "Goody" and Fulk Davis raised. The Haines family had dowry for each. Whole lotta fact shifting in Connecticut.

Sayler and Skidmore researchers agree there's something sketchy Gardiner, Baker, and Osborne. The printer, Hunt published anything, for the right amount of money.

The facts show, "Goody" and Fulk were attempting to raise Haynes/Haines granddaughters as, "spinsters", and at the age of marriage, if they were not likely to be married "Goody" and Fulk Davis could apply to court for dowry. The oldest Haynes/Haines grandaughter married Sayler, the youngest married Skidmore. Fulk went to Gardiner, Gardiner made the plan, Baker and Osborne were accomplices, Hunt, the paid broadcaster. This has already been brought to the Genealogy Society Authorities.

This was researched and printed about 1972-1974.

He was never accused of adultry. That's a fact. Because Fulk Davis went to Leon Gardiner and the rest is published concocted b.s. to throw the investigation away from Dowry chasing, and adultrous affairs Fulk Davis had.

There should be plenty of citations of sources with Genealogical Societies of any merit.

Are there links (URLs) to these societies and / or the books mentioned?

O.D. Lambert says Haines most probably descended from Haines/Hines/Hind coming to America out of Norway/Denmark, before that surname Rind out of Germany. Fulk's first wife is related to Abraham Haines, who settled in what is now West Virginia before 1742.

Most of this research was beginning to be digitized in late 1990's. I haven't come across any URL's. Most of the books confirming this are in privately held family genealogy. Some of it leaks out, by researchers studying surname origins, by looking into specific surnames.

Showing all 17 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion