I've spent the last few days trying to sort out the horrible tangle of his wives. If you had thrown their names and vitals for all three of them into a pot and stirred, you couldn't have gotten a bigger mess. I'm almost there, but still have a few things I could use some help with.
It appears that he was actually born about 1621, rather than ten years earlier. Documentation in the profile. As the incorrect information is so widely-disseminated, it would be a great if a curator could lock that field to prevent future "corrections" to it.
There seems to be some disagreement among the experts as to whether he had sons - but the one thing everyone agrees on is that there is no extant DIRECT evidence of male heirs. Therefore I've taken the liberty of cutting free the two or three Coreys (Jonathan, Thomas, and Matthew) who are often appended to him. Although they did exist, and there is evidence that they were in the area at about the same time, there is no actual proof linking them to him. Thomas, in particular, could not have been his son as Thomas was born in 1622.
His first wife has a spouse attached that I can't account for. Suspect he was married to someone with a similar name, but does not actually belong to the first wife of Giles Corey. Would like to cut him free but don't want to screw up someone's tree - it would be best to attach him where he actually belongs, rather than consigning him and his descendants to limbo. Anyone have a clue who William Clare might actually have been married to?
A similar problem arises with one of Corey's daughters, Margaret Cleaves . Her first husband was William Clements (as documented in two Salem V.R. records) but has been incorrectly written as William Cleaves in several published genealogies. Cleaves was the husband of her sister, Martha.
My first impulse was to simply merge the two profiles (the right Cleaves with the wrong one) and then cut him free from Margaret, to whom he was never married - but am afraid that this will cause uproar down the road. It would be wonderful if someone more familiar with Margaret and her children could ensure that the kids are assigned to the correct mothers - and if there could be some consensus among some of the profile managers before taking action. I don't want to end up with my head on a spike...