I’m a “project princess” myself, so I’m happy to shift focus on this discussion and address some of your questions, Private User
Re: I can't imagine that you be able of help if you want to be part of that many, but it seems possible and exists.
First, I believe you miscounted. Look again at the number of projects and profiles. Not that this is very relevant to anything other than “active member.” And, frankly, really not anyone’s business. But I’ll address privacy (below).
For myself, I currently manage over 139K profiles and am a member of over 8,000 projects. It’s so many projects I have difficulty from the drop down list.
So why am I in so many projects? Mostly to add members to projects. That is one of the most useful things I can do to help researchers.
Our USA geography projects were set up “empty” and groups of people - some curators, some not - have been frequently invited to come collaborate. We may not do anything special, sometimes add profiles. Patricia Ann Scoggin set up her amazing https://www.geni.com/projects/Medical-Portal/47725 in the same fashion. She always invites me and a few others when she creates a new project as requested.
And why, if you find it really necessary to go in projects where it seems not logical on a first view, to tell what your motivation is to have access to it?
Yes, I agree that a reason for requesting to join a project would be helpful. Otherwise we may find ourselves making unwarranted pre judgments. Perhaps you could request that of geni in an enhancement request.
Maybe that is an issue for Geni too to put in their terms, for so many do not want to work in Geni because the risk that total unknown users interfere in serious genealogical research.
I’m not sure what you mean by that or what you perceive the risk is, in a project, to serious genealogical research. Do you refer to adding profiles that don’t belong? The responsibility of project collaborators is to remove them as noticed, of course. Do you refer to the project “about”? It can be reverted from an inappropriate edit: again, a project collaborator responsibility. There have been a few instances (very few) of project vandalism or inappropriate images, and those are reportable to geni customer support … by project collaborators. So, I need a clarification of perceived danger.
But also others in Geni got the idea to be followed and shadowed by persons they never get to know and that's not a nice feeling.
Have you tried writing, nicely, to someone you think is shadowing you? Start by introducing yourself to them. Geni has the “follow” ability, some (I guess you?) find it creepy. You can stop someone from following you by blocking, then unblocking.
Which brings me to privacy on geni.
I’ve always been a believer in deceased / public profiles on geni for my own family, and haven’t worried overmuch about genealogical “mistakes” in profiles because I learned how to fix them. However, someone didn’t like some curating decisions, and unfortunately vandalized some of my personal ancestry. So, I had to extend my privacy zone. Others have explained to me that they have living relatives who are quite elderly, so their zone of privacy ends up being quite a ways back.
But I agree that it’s better to make locked master profiles than privatize as a solution to genealogy mistakes, and urge everyone to take advantage of the discussion:
Curators: Please make this profile a Master Profile!
https://www.geni.com/discussions/272715?msg=1667580
Or - reach out to your local curator.