Here is a suggestion for Curators or whoever does the deleting. Put yourself as main manager along with the other person that you were going to delete. Here is a problem that happens and I dont know if anyone thought this through to the end of cause and effect of deleting.
When you delete a person connected to the profile, it not only blocks their path to their ancestors but it also blocks others path to their ancestors. People that have been relying on that person in their family group and collaboration.
And what if they come back after being sick in the hospital and find all their profiles have been deleted under their name. I understand the zombie problem, but I dont understand why their name and connections have to be removed. You as curators should have the power to put your name on it without deleting the person that put it on the tree in the first place.
This will also become the same type of problem if their is a switch so that only curators or Main profile managers are on the profile and all other managers are taken off. Not all collaborate or are family members with all Curators. So it would also block their paths to ancestors.
These are not critisisms, just suggestions to make it smoother for all on the tree,
I like that they now put the dates, it makes it a lot easier when one is trying to determine the correct parents . ie: differienciate between a parant and a grandparent, One knows that a parent is not going to be 50 years younger than a child.
Again, I am still working on data conflicts, so that their will only be one in a stack. I use the main profile as my guide for the correct information. All 15 others are trying to merge in. I hope this is helping to finish merges and clearing the board of frustrations.
Peace and joy in genealogy
gini